Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br />things done for the purposes of society and that the law will protect and <br /> <br />In the past. cost-benefit analyses of water resources projects have <br /> <br />foster the greatest values of water. Therefore. he believes that water <br /> <br />not adequately considered all the environmental. or social. costs and bene- <br /> <br />laws can be changed if society so dictates but also warns that institutions <br /> <br />fits. However. more recently. Krutilla and his coworkers have pioneered in <br /> <br />such as law may be resistant to and require time for change. Administra- <br /> <br />this area and now many more of the nonmarket values are being incorporated <br /> <br />tive strategies for legislative improvement in such instances are suggested <br /> <br />in these analyses. (See. for example. Krutilla and Fisher. 1975.) The <br /> <br />by Jensen (1976). <br /> <br />present market system does not properly weigh the short- and long-range <br /> <br />2. Environmental and ecological effects of land management practices. <br /> <br />costs and benefits that must be applied to the renewable and nonrenewable <br /> <br />This research should address ways to reduce the environmental impacts of <br /> <br />resources of the Rocky Mountain region (Neuhold. Herrick. and Patten. 1975). <br /> <br />watershed management practices on streamflow, water quality, and aesthetics. <br /> <br />Next to research on the environmental impacts of energy development. Thorne <br /> <br />and on game and nongame species of fish and on wildlife. The research <br /> <br />(1973) recommended research on agricultural tmpacts in this region. Thorne <br /> <br />should include the effects of logging and grazing on forested watersheds <br /> <br />emphasized that energy development poses the threat of increasing salinity <br /> <br />in the Intermountain West, Grazing and logging result in the release of <br /> <br />loads in the Colorado River that will reduce crop production. and also that <br /> <br />sediments to streams. The effects of sediment on the aquatic life (macro- <br /> <br />water quality will enter the political arena through national and inter- <br /> <br />mined, <br /> <br />4. Minimizing the effects of stream alterations. Streams are al- <br /> <br />.' <br />.. <br />'" <br />~. <br />... <br />< <br />, <br /> <br />invertebrates and fish) in this region are not known and should be deter- <br /> <br />national agreements. <br /> <br />Thorne (1973) suggested, as a top priority for research. determining <br /> <br />tered for various purposes. including highway construction and flood con- <br /> <br />r <br />" <br /> <br />the effects of different levels and types of energy development on the <br /> <br />trol. Some estimates are that between 30 percent and 70 percent of streams <br /> <br />... <br />~ <br />.. <br /> <br />total environment of the Upper Colorado region. and to critically analyze <br /> <br />in the intermountain region have been altered by channelization. The bene- <br /> <br />~ <br />... <br />.. <br />.. <br />... <br />~ <br />, <br />" <br />.. <br />... <br /> <br />alternative strategies. The critical points for decisions on future op- <br /> <br />fits of these alterations are often derived over short periods of time. <br /> <br />tions in land- and water-use planning must be identified and understood <br /> <br />but the impacts on aquatic communities may be felt for long periods. <br /> <br />(Neuhold. Herrick. and Patten. 1975), <br /> <br />Since energy and other development will result in the channeling of streama. <br /> <br />3. Effects of salinity increases. water quality degradation. and <br /> <br />management agencies must be able to predict what the impacts of this will <br /> <br />sediments on aquatic life, Energy development in the Upper Colorado River <br /> <br />be on fish and wildlife. and what can be done to reduce these impacts. <br /> <br />Basin will affect the salinity and water quality of the river system. <br /> <br />Streams in the intermountain area are currently being impounded to <br /> <br />Agencies that manage fish and wildlife resources do not have the necessary <br /> <br />store runoff for later use. Several reports have recommended that free- <br /> <br />information to determine what the effects of these factors will be on game <br /> <br />flowing streams with unique and/or high qualities be examined for their <br /> <br />fish or on threatened and endangered species. <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />,), <br />J$; <br />/~~ <br />