Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />N <br />. . <br /> <br />$'6/ <br /> <br />sublethal ef- <br />ethroat trout. <br />eries Society <br /> <br />:ortisollevels <br />md Compar- <br /> <br />upon the he- <br />dfish (Caras- <br />. Utah State <br /> <br />1979, Effects <br />ratus) hema- <br /> <br />Wocd \Nard c+ a I. <br />Iq~5 <br /> <br />Transactions o/the American Fisheries Society 114:887-894, 1985 <br /> <br />/' .- j(S-,'" ),1 / ,,)Irh 'J <br />' '::1:>11:; <br />I /" I , <br /> <br />07$SO <br /> <br />Leaching of Retorted Oil Shale: Assessing the Toxicity <br />to Colorado Squawfish, Fathead Minnows, <br />and Two Food-Chain Organisms <br /> <br />D. F. WOODWARD,1 R. G. RILEy,2 M. G. HENRY, <br />J. S. MEYER,3 AND T. R. GARLAND2 <br /> <br />Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory <br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Route 1, Columbia, Missouri 65201 <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />Development of a large shale-oil industry in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming would result in <br />disposal of large volumes of retorted shale. Water percolating through these wastes could leach <br />toxicants into surface waters of the upper Colorado River system. Leachate from field Iysimeters <br />containing shale that had gone through the Paraho retorting process 6 years before had high <br />concentrations of K, Li, Mg, Mo, Na, S04, and N03. Total concentrations of organics in leachate <br />were low; nitrogen-containing aromatic hydrocarbons approximated background concentrations. <br />In 96-h exposures, undiluted leachate was not toxic to fathead minnows Pimephales promelas or <br />Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius, and was only slightly toxic to the mayfly Hexagenia <br />bilineata and to Daphnia magna. In 30-d exposures to different concentrations of the leachate, a <br />concentration of 6:94 (percent leachate:percent dilution water) caused reduced growth of fathead <br />minnows and reduced survival of mayflies. The highest test concentration not causing toxic effects <br />was 3:97. This dilution represented conductivity of 1,080 ItS/cm and total dissolved solids of750 <br />mglL-values that are 1.2 to 2.0 times higher than in the Colorado and White rivers at the Colorado- <br />Utah border. The elements Li and Sr appeared to be selectively accumulated by the two fish species. <br />Deleterious effects of leachates from retorted oil shale appear to be unlikely in major rivers with <br />large dilution factors, Feeder streams and backwater areas with less flushing may require protection, <br /> <br />Received November 26, 1984 Accepted May 13, 1985 <br /> <br />,," <br />'[ <br /> <br />We <br />" <br />;: <br /> <br />t <br />i <br />i <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />t Since 1974, the high price and uncertain sup- <br />..' ply of foreign crude oil have stimulated interest <br />.", in developing the vast oil shale reserves of the <br />I United States. The Green River Formation, un- <br />.. derlying 90,000 km of Colorado, Utah, and Wy- <br />t oming, has an oil reserve of2.86 x 1012 m3 (Fox <br />t 1980)-more than twice the total worldwide oil <br />reserves estimated in 1975 (USBM 1975). The <br />, ' environmental effects of extensive oil shale de- <br />t ve!opment need to be anticipated, About 1,130 <br />kg of processed (spent) shale will be discarded <br />for every cubic meter of shale oil produced. The <br />potential mobilization of salts, trace metals, and <br />organic compounds from disposal sites is great <br /> <br />I Columbia National Fisheries Research Labora- <br />, tory, Field Research Laboratory-Jackson, Post Office <br />; Box 1089, Jackson, Wyoming 83001. <br />t 2 Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Post Office <br />f Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352. <br />t 3 Fish Physiology and Toxicology Laboratory, De- <br />, partment of Zoology and Physiology, University of <br />l Wyoming, Laramie 82071. <br /> <br />(Franswayand Wagenet 1981; Pereira et al. 1981; <br />Stollenwerk and Runnells 1981). Leachates en- <br />tering ground and surface waters could harm <br />water quality and freshwater organisms. <br />The Green River Formation underlies part of <br />the upper Colorado River watershed, including <br />the Green, White, and Yampa rivers, This sys- <br />tem contains several native fishes that are en- <br />dangered or threatened with extinction (Behnke <br />and Benson 1980). One of these, the Colorado <br />squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius, is the largest cyp- <br />rinid in North America. Although it once inhab- <br />ited most of the larger rivers of the basin, it is <br />now limited to the lower Green, White, and <br />Yampa rivers and the upper Colorado River. <br />Young-of-the-year Colorado squawfish prefer <br />backwater habitats (Holden 1977; Tyus et al. <br />1982), from which incoming leachate may be <br />flushed slowly, These backwater nursery areas <br />provide a food source of crustaceans, aquatic in- <br />sects, and fish. <br />Several studies addressed the water quality of <br />leachates from spent shale, both in laboratory <br /> <br />887 <br />