Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />,~ <br />'f' <br /> <br />92 <br /> <br />American Fisheries Society <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />DILL, WII.L.'AM A. <br />1944. The fishery of the IUlVer Colorado River. Calif. Fish amI Game, Vol. 30, <br />No.3, [lp. 1O'J-211. <br /> <br />EIClll;ll, JR., GEORGE J, <br />1947. Trout anti Ill<': Culoradu ]{iv,'r. Ariz. \Vildliic Spnrlsnwn, Vol. 8, No, 4, <br />pp,7-11. <br />FVEIlMANI\ 1hlno.,>; \V., and CLOlJl'SI.EF, HLTn:1l <br />'lil95. Th~~ tishes of thc Culorado Basin. 13ull. U. S. Fish. Comm" Vol. 14 (IW)4), <br />pp. 473-4S(i. <br /> <br />(;ILJlI:ll'f, ell,'IlLES 11., ;lI1d NOH,\I,,'N B. SUIFIEJ.O , <br />IS98. Noll:s on a cflllcctioll nf fisl,cs frum thc Colurado l3asln ill ,\ril.l.'lIa. Proc. <br />U. S. Nal. J\illS, Vol. 20, pp. 4S7-4'J'J. <br />HUBBS CAllI. 1.., and I{OIlERT H.. !\oflLL1':I{ <br />1941.' Studies of tl,c fislws of the Order Cyprinodf'llt,'s. XVII. (;ellcra and <br />species of thc Colorado Rivcr system. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zoul., L;niv. Mich., <br />No. 4.13, pp. ]-9, " . , <br />]948a. Two new, relict I!Jnera of cyprnnd fishes from Nevada. llJld., No. 507, <br />~I~ . _. , . <br />1948h. The zooJog-ical evidcnce: Correlation hetwcell tbh dlstrthlltlOn and hydro- <br />j.(raphi" Ilislory in the desert basins of western Unitcd St,rlcs. Hull. Univ. <br />Utah (Diol. SeLl, Vo!. 10, No.7, pp. 17-]()o. <br />jOIWAN, DAVID STAI~H, and I.IAHTUN \""A'WEN En:RM^="r.: <br />] HfJO-]<)OO. The Itsiles at North and Middle America. BIIII. U. S. Nal. MilS., <br />No. 47 (4 parts), pp. 1-3.3J:l. <br />Km'fT, JOIlI'o: A, ,. " <br />1')49. Ecology, hn:eding habits and young stagl~s of C/'t'lIlchthys balleYI, a cyp- <br />rinodont fish uj Nevada. Copeia, 1<)49, No, I, pp. 56-61. <br />:-'frLLER, ROIlERT R. <br />1946a. The need for ichthyo}"g-ical surveys of the major rivcrs "f western North <br />America. Sciellce, Vol. 104, No. 2710, pp. 5]7-519. <br />194oh. Gila c"pha, a n'J11arkallle new sl','cies of c)'prinid fish from tlw Colorado <br />I~iVl'r 'in (;rand Canyon, Aril.()na. Juur. Wdsh. Acad. Sci., Vol. 36, No. ]2, <br />PI'. 409-415. <br />:>'1 I LI.F.R, HOIlEIlT R, ,111d.1, R. AI.C<IHN <br />I1J4ri. The illlr/Jdlll'cr! fishes of Nev;llla. with a hisu,ry of their intrnrhlrtion. <br />TrailS. Am. Fish. Suc" V/J1. 73 ()1)43), 1'1'.173-19,1, <br />l\fOFf'I':TT, JAM ES \V. <br />1942. A fisherv sur\'('v of the Co!',r;rr!lI Rivcr helow Donlr!er ]);1111. Calif. Fish <br />alHl G;1I11e, Vo1.'28, No.2, pp. 7f,-H(" <br />194.3. A preliminary report 011 the fIshery of Lake Mead. Trans. Rth N. Am. <br />Wildlife Conf., pp. ]7<)-]86. <br />SNYUF.R. JOliN OTTERm:rN <br />1915. Notes on a collection of fishcs made hy Dr. Edgar A. ~'learns from rivers <br />trihutarv to the Gulf of California. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. 49, <br />PII. 573-586. <br />T ANNEn, VASCO M. <br />1932. A description of NotolcpidoltlJ'::oll utahCtlsis, a new catostomid from Utah. <br />Cupeia, ]<).12, No. J. [lp. 135-136. <br />1936. A study of the fishes of Utah. Proc. Utah Acad. Sci. Arts, and Lett., <br />Vol. 13, pp. 155-185. <br />1942. A review of the genus Notolcpido1lly::oll with a description of a new species <br />(Pisces-Catoslomidac). Grcat Basin Nat., Vol. 3, pp. 27-32. <br />WORTH, S .G. <br />1895. Report on the propagation and distrihution of food-fishes. Rept. U. S.' <br />Comm. Fish and Fish. (1893), pp. 78-138. <br /> <br />, ..: ~ <br /> <br />.,,:,;., <br /> <br />. .....: <br /> <br />, >ffiJ <br />!~h <br />f'1.;-.t'~ <br /> <br />.'."", <br /> <br /> <br />CHOWT}I R\TE OF FOUr, ~PEcrES UF FISH IN A <br />SECTIUN ()F TilE i\.1l~SOUIU RIVER HETWEE'N <br />l1ULTER D.\:-") ..\ND CASCADE, <br />JvrUN'L-\NN <br /> <br />'/0.";'1:1'11 W. K.\THHEIN <br />;\/is.wlIri ('OIl.l'I'rVII!1II11 COlli III issioll, c'o/UIII/jill, .llis.\iJuri <br /> <br />.-\nSTlC-\.CT <br /> <br />A. study oi age and gruwth rates of four species oi fish taken from thc Mis- <br />sumi HiveI'. hetween Hulter Dam and Cascade, Montana, was made during tlw <br />SllI1llll''rS oj 1')41) and 194<), Fuur hUlldred and seventy-eight rainbow trout 127 <br />hr,Jwn trout, H7 longnose suckers, and 223 western white suckers were e~am- <br />1I1ed. Age gruups of rainbow trout ranged from I to VII; brown trout, I to <br />IX; longn,'se Slickers, III. to V.III;, western white suckers, I to VIII. Age <br />grollP 11 was rno,'t predumlllant III rall1bow and brown trout, group VI in long, <br />nus". Slickers, aud group III in westcrn white suckers. Greatest growth was <br />;~llanll'd dUJ"lng thc sec.ond y"ar ill rainbow and brown trout, and during the <br />!'.rsl and tfllrd years tor .Iunj.(nose and western white suckers, respectively. <br />I rout gruwth IS more ra'llld than sucker growth. The majority of trout were <br />represented In age groups I-I If, while suckers w('re predominantly repre- <br />sellted in age groups IV-VIII. Coefficient of condition for 4B1 rainbow trout <br />was 37.2 and i or I] 7 brown trout was 34,6. <br /> <br />INTJWDUCTlON <br /> <br />During tlie SlIJ11nll:rs of 1948 and 1949 a lislwries survey was COII- <br />ducted on a section of the l\'lissouri River hetween Holter Darn and Cas- <br />,ark, Montana. Since no previous tisheries investigations on this pan <br />of the rivtr were kllown to the writer, a study oi the g-rowth charac- <br />Inistics oi Some oi the more important species was undertaken to <br />assist in an evaluation of management prohlems. <br /> <br />Rainhow trout (-S'n/lllo !laird/lcrii) and brown trout (Sa/lllo IrUltll), <br />which are the most ill1Jxlrlant game fish in this section of the river, <br />and longnose sucker (CatosIO/Jllls ra/ostolllttS) and western white Slicker <br />(Ca~ostol/Jus rOllllllc;rsolmii sHcklii), two of the more important forage <br />speCIes, were examllled. <br /> <br />There arc 35 milt's of stream between Holter Dam and Cascade. The <br />upper 15 miles 0 f this stretch t ra verse a narrow valley of meadow <br />la~d. Below this area the river tJrst flows through a canyon for 8 <br />mdes and then through :.In open valley of farm land for the remain- <br />ing distance. The gradient in this section of river is relatively low with <br />:.I fall of 3.1 feet per mile. In other respects the river is similar to <br />other streams of the region. <br /> <br />lContribution from Monlana Slale Collcll'e Agricultural Experimenl' Sial ion. Proitct No.8". <br />Paper No. 23 I Journal Serino <br /> <br />93 <br />