Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Selenium-mthe Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />325 <br /> <br />TIlble3..Seleoium c:oocentratiODS in muscle plugs'oompared to c:ooceOCIationsfoundin.a4jaoeot4l1~letissue; Results exp~;as.p.glgdry <br />weight ,.;. r",j. v . .J? <br /> <br />,:"; 1- <br /> <br />C.V. <br />(%) <br /> <br />Species <br /> <br />Razorback suck~ <br /> <br /> Muscle <br /> Location plug <br /> dorsal 3.4 <br /> posterior 3.2 <br /> anterior 3.6 <br /> 3.4 f 0.2" <br />;. dorsal.. 5.9 <br /> posteri?f . 6.8 <br /> anterior 5.6 <br /> 6.1 :!:0.6 <br /> dorsal 8.7 <br /> posterior 9.2 <br /> anterior 8.8 <br /> 8.9:!: 03 <br /> . .dorsal 13. <br /> posterior.. 13. <br /> . anterior 14. <br /> 13. :!: 0.2 <br /> dorsal 4.8 <br /> posterior 3.9 <br /> anterior 2.4 <br /> 3.7:!: 1.2 <br /> dorsal 6.5 <br /> posterior 7.2 <br /> anterior 5.6 <br /> 6.4 :!: 0.8 <br /> dorsal 5.2 <br /> posterior 5.4 <br /> anterior 2.9 <br /> 4.5 :!: 1.4 <br /> dorsal 6.8d <br /> posterior 7.ft <br /> anterior 6.1 <br /> <br />CommoI!. Cl!IP <br /> <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />~' <br />. Q(p <br /> <br /> <br />Common Carp <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker <br /> <br />Flannelmoutb sucker <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker <br /> <br />Mean pair testing <br />LSD = .0.57 ,.a= 0.05 <br /> <br />C.V:- <br />(%) <br /> <br />"MU$;:le'; <br />. tissue" <br /> <br /> <br />3.2 <br />2.7 <br />3.2 <br />. 3:0:!: 0.3 <br />'5.8 <br />5.9' <br />6.0 <br />5.9i:!: 0: 1 <br />,: 8.5 <br />.;~8.1 <br />8.9 <br />8.7 :!:0.2 <br />13.2 <br />14.0 <br />13.8 <br />14. :!: 0.4 <br />4.6 <br />4.5 <br />4.7 <br />4.6:!:0.1 <br />5.8 <br />6.6 <br />6.1 <br />6.2 :!: 0.4 <br />5.0 <br />5.1 <br />5.4 <br />5.2:!: 0.2 <br />6.6 <br />6.8d <br />6.g<I <br /> <br />4.0 <br /> <br />9.5 <br /> <br />'1.8 <br /> <br /> <br />1.7 <br /> <br />3.3 <br /> <br />2.3 <br /> <br />L5 <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />32.4 <br /> <br />2.2 <br /> <br />12.5 <br /> <br />6.5 <br /> <br />31.1 <br /> <br />.C.V, . = cOefficient 'of variatiOll <br />barcbivedfreezerspCciIhen <br />cmean :!:~devilitio.n <br />dmean difference exceeds lsD when paired with mean from anterior muscle plug (6.07) <br /> <br />icant correlation between muScle plllgmass and selenium con- <br />centration (r = +0.32). <br />Eggs (2 g) and milt (2 mL) from razorback suckers that were <br />collected from Razorback Bar were analyzed for selenium by <br />Hamilton and Waddell (1994), and these results are indicated in <br />Table 2. Eggs had selenium concentrations that were above <br />those found in control fish from laboratory studies or reference <br />fIsh from fIeld studies. Concentrations of selenium in eggs and <br />milt were significantly correlated with selenium concentrations <br />in muscle plugs taken from the same fIsh (Hamilton and Wad- <br />dell 1994). Concentrations of selenium found in skeletal muscle <br />and eggs of razorback suckers may be a cause of reproductive <br />problems responsible for the decline of this species in the Colo- <br />rado River basin. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Muscle Plug Technique <br /> <br />Selenium concentrations in muscle plugs and adjacent muscle <br />tissue taken from three different areas of the same fIsh are <br />shown in Table 3 for a frozen razorback sucker and for common <br />carp and flanoelmouth suckers collected from the Colorado <br /> <br />River basin. A signifIcant correlation was found between sele- <br />nium concentrations in muscle plugs and muscle tissue col- <br />lected from the same location and fIsh (r = 0.97, P =0.01, n = <br />21). Selenium concentrations from the three plug locations had <br />coefficients of variation ranging from 1.5 to 32.4%. Whereas <br />coefficients of variation were less than 10 % for muscle plugs <br />from razorback sucker and common carp, flannelmouth suckers <br />exhibited greater variation (12.5 to 32.4%). In each flannel- <br />mouth sucker, the selenium concentration in the anterior mus- <br />cle plug was a source of increased variation, as this value was <br />noticeably less than selenium concentrations from dorsal and <br />posterior plugs. The source of variation does not seem to be <br />analytical and may be more related to differences in anterior <br />plug composition. Selenium concentrations in muscle tissue <br />collected adjacent to each plug had coefficients of variation less <br />than 10% for all three fIsh species. <br />To test whether selenium' concentrations in muscle plugs <br />were signifIcantly different from each other or from those in <br />adjacent muscle tissue, selenium concentrations from the same <br />location (anterior, dorsal, or posterior) and tissue type (plug or <br />muscle) were pooled and the means computed. Table 3 shows <br />the results of means testing by Fisher's Least Significant Differ- <br />