Laserfiche WebLink
<br />344 <br /> <br />CHAPTER t 4 <br /> <br />Vi <br />a: 1-5 <br />c:x: <br />W <br />> 6-10 <br />- <br />o <br />o 11 -15 <br />a: <br />~ 16 - 20 <br />W <br />:E 21 - 30 <br />~ <br /> <br />:::::~~::~:~:~::~~~~~::~~~~:~:~~~:~:~:~: <br />:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. : <br /> <br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~t t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~: <br /> <br />.................... <br />. .. . .. .. . . . . . . ... .. '" <br />. . '" . .. ... .. . . . ... . . '" <br />. .. . .... .. . . .. . .. . . . <br />.................... <br />.................... <br />.................... <br />.................... <br />.................... <br /> <br /> <br />o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 <br /> <br />PERCENT <br /> <br />Figure 14.4 Length of time that chemical treatment has been found to be effective. <br />Effective time depends on the physical and chemical factors of the treated waters as well <br />as the target species. <br /> <br />should be obvious that programs not considered to be beneficial would be <br />discontinued. Cost alone cannot serve as the measure of the value of a treatment <br />program. Common sense must playa large role. <br />Trimberger (1975) reported that increases in the number of game fish available <br />to anglers and increases in fishing pressure followed most chemical reclamation <br />projects in Michigan. Fishing pressure on formerly marginal trout waters after <br />chemical treatment has equalled the pressure on the best trout waters. Trimberger <br />also reported that chemical treatments of warmwater lakes consistently resulted <br />in more angler days per acre than were attributable to other management <br />strategies. Similar statements have been made by fisheries managers throughout <br />North America. <br />Periods of effectiveness range from less than I to 30 years (Figure 14.4). When <br />benefits are substantial, treatment programs can be scheduled at regular intervals. <br />Annual treatments of particular waters are usually considered too costly for <br />benefits realized. <br /> <br />14.5 BIOLOGICAL METHODS FOR MANAGING <br />UNDESIRABLE FISH SPECIES <br /> <br />Biological control methods can be grouped into three categories: (1) grazing and <br />predation by protozoa, zooplankton, fish, birds, insects, snails, crayfish, turtles, <br />and mammals; (2) use of pathogens (viruses, bacteria, and fungi); and (3) <br />biomanipulation, in which interrelationships among plants, animals, and their <br />environment are adjusted to achieve the desired control and ecological balance <br />(Schuytema 1977). Biomanipulation is the most promising biological control <br />technique for managing fish populations in that it may minimize competition and <br />establish balanced predator-prey populations (Box 14.4). The use of pathogens <br />for fish control is risky; therefore, pathogens are not generally used in aquatic <br />environments. <br />Mechanical and chemical control of nuisance aquatic plants is generally <br />temporary and expensive. Biological control of such vegetation by using grazers <br />