My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8127
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:40:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8127
Author
Wydoski, R. S., D. A. Smith, K. M. Schreiner and J. E. Johnson.
Title
1977 Annual Conference Western Association of Game and Fish Commissioners and Western Division, American Fisheries Society Tuscon, Arizona.
USFW Year
1977.
USFW - Doc Type
n.d.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the art of biopolitics involves motivating the general public so that it <br />will demand changes for the benefit of wildlife resources. He is supported <br />by Gilbert (1971), who emphasized that the manager must use effective pub- <br />lic relations to help influence politicians and political action in t~e <br />proper direction to .conserve natural resources. The thoughts just presented <br />on critical habitat provide practical or realistic approaches.to maintaining <br />such habitat for threatened and endangered species as well as for preserving <br />habitat required by game or commercial spec.ies. <br /> <br />Propagation. Propagation has been considered a viable option in most <br />recovery plans that have been drafted. Most of the research for development <br />of the methodology for propagation has been on birds and mammals (U.S. Fish <br />and Hildlife Service, 1976). Although some success has been achieved in <br />rearing the Colorado squawfish and humpback sucker (Toney, 1974), much work <br />renains to be done on space requirements, nutritional requirements, and <br />behavior if management of these species by propagation is to be successful. <br /> <br />Once a propagation program is successful and surplus animals are avail- <br />able, stocking can be made in suitable natural habitats. However, careful <br />evaluation of such releases must be made so that past mistakes in releasing <br />game birds, fish, and mammals are not repeated. Natural areas within state <br />or federal refuges, monuments, or parks that provide suitable habitat for <br />threatened and endangered species should be used when possible, since these <br />habitats can be protected and are already under state or federal management <br />(D~ffey, 1974). <br /> <br />.. Perhaps the most important prac~ical consideration for propagation <br />r. should be the gene pool of the captive stock. As plant and animal popula- <br />tions decline until the species is rare, the genetic diversity of the species <br />may be decreased. This gene~lc diversity Of. heterozygosity allows the org- <br />anism to adapt to various environmental conditions, and its decrease may <br />accelerate the extinction of the species. Smith et al. (1976) revie..:ed the <br />i~portance of population genetics in the management of all fish and wildlife <br />populations, and their concern is especially applicable to threatened and <br />endangered species. <br /> <br />Funding of Endangered Species Programs and the Systems Approach for <br />Establishing Priorities. Adequate funding for research and management of <br />endangered species is not now available. Pister (1976) concluded that it <br />should be a function of legislative bodies to provide the finances for such <br />programs. This will not be accomplished easily, because federal and state <br />conservation agencies are alreaoy underfunded and understaffed. <br /> <br />As I mentioned earlier, public support and pressure will be required <br />to obtain the funds necessary for endangered species programs. Since <br />several states have experimented without much success to obtain funds in <br />various ways, the most practical solution to fund an endangered species <br />program would be to obtain state general funds that could be used as match- <br />ingfor federal assistance under the 1973 Act. Such funding should be <br />acceptable to the public and should not cause a conflict with sportsmen by <br />using rever.ue from their license fees. <br /> <br />280 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.