8127 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ species. Often, because the funds for agencies came entirely from license fees, managers felt committed to serve primarily the hunter and fishenman. Because their funds for operations and personnel wey.e severely 1 imi ted, agency managers were confronted with a conflict between the historical emphasis on game species and the newly generated public demand that nongame species be included. Pister (1976) pointed out that the majority of the public do not hunt or fish, but bear an interest in fish and wildlife resources that is legitimate and must be recognized. He emphasized that managers must address themselves to management and preservation of species as mandated by the general public, and that the determination of how such programs are financed should be a legislative function. Evenden (l976) also believed that pro- fessionals in wildlife should accept the fact that their responsibilities are to all forms of wildlife, not only to sport or commercial species. Udall (1970) summarized hi s thoughts in thi sway: "Today, our need for wildlife resources goes far deeper than the ready provision of food or profit -- we need wild things now as ever-present emblems of the beauty and hope of life itself. In an increasingly ugly, dehumanized world, wildlife in all its myriad forms is part of the geography of hope: its health and presence re-creates our spirits, and gives us daily assurance . that nature's life machine is still functioning.1I All species are considered significant in some ecological, scientific, historical, recreational, educational, or esthetic aspects (U.S. Congress, ,1973). ~1yers (1977) emphasized that the strongest argurilent for preservation and management of any species is that it can and does serve man in agricul- ture, as food, in the preparation of medicine and pharmaceuticals~ in indus- try, and in a number of other ways. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1969) stated that there is little doubt that the ~~erican public could get along without most species of wild- life, but it could also get along without automobiles~.baseball~ and many other things. What is the value or significance to future generations of a species that becomes extinct? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1969) took the position that liAs the numbers of our wildl ife grO\i fe\oJer~ their true individual value grows greater, for in the few are concentrated all the 'oJorth of one small, but valuable part of our 'oJhole world.11 MAN--HIS OWN WORST ENEMY Man may be considered a threatened species because his self-induced overpopulation and unbridled technology are threatening his environment; man stands at a fork in his environmental road to the future and may move rapidly to\'Iard one of two destinations: IIr'~an -- Haster of Himselfll or "fv~an -- Extinct Speciesll (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1968). . Man has dominated and will continue to dominate his environment. He has intentionally and unintentionally destroyed or disrupted natural habi- tat that is considered vital for the well-being of fish and wildlife 277 J""