8127 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. Problems encountered or anticipated with respect to the endangered species program, as I've outlined some of them here, are not insurmountable. Trends, and perhaps my pessimistic nature, however, cause me to question whether we are really in concert in our interest or our efforts to resolve these problems. . ~ I believe states have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to manage wildlife resources. It has been a matter of reorientation for most of us, but we are interested in, concerned about, and involved with threatened, endangered, and other nongame species. These efforts need nurture, not nonsense. As one state summed up: The accomplishments of and efforts expended by the federal government in the management of . . . endangered wildlife species are commendable and wholeheartedly supported. How- ever, we must emphasize that any federal endangered species management program should be cognizant of the State's socio- economic concerns, jurisdiction and ability in managing its resources. Perhaps a tempered approach to the much-needed protection of endangered species would best serve the interest of all concerned parties. It is our conviction that realistic management of endangered species should be based on substantive data and that judicious management and optimal utilization of the State's resources should not be denied by well meaning yet seemingly excessive and arbitrary restrictions imposed in the interest of protecting endangered species. I would only add that reason and flexibility in rules and regulations and in their administration might result in a lot more benefit to wildlife than head-on collisions. The snail darter and Furbish lousevv'ort may prove to be cases in point. 290