My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7949
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7949
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:39:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7949
Author
Williams, J. E.
Title
Taxonomic Status Of
USFW Year
1978
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DISCUSSION. Rhinichthys osculus moapae is characterized by <br />adaptations to s'wift water. Large, expansive, falcate dorsal and anal <br />fins and expansive, deeply-forked caudals are typical. The caudal <br />peduncle is relatively long and slender. ;\iIany of these swift-water <br />adaptations are illustrated by comparing a spring form of Rhinichthys <br />05culus (for example, the population of R. o. robustus inhabiting the <br />Big Shipley Spring, Diamond Valley, Eureka County, Nevada) to <br />R. o. moapae (Table 1). Rhinichthys osculus moapae exhibits larger <br />size, more slender head, body, and caudal peduncle, greater anal to <br />caudal length, and greater dorsal and caudal fln lengths. Complete re- <br />sults of morphometric and meristic analyses are reported in Tables <br />2. and 3. <br />In addition to the information provided in the tables, the presence <br />or absence of barbels and premaxillary frenum was recorded. Of 32- <br />fish examined for these characters, 90.6% had 2. barbels and 93.8% <br />had a premaxillary frenum, which often is well developed. No fish <br />vvere found with only 1 barbel. All fish with barbels also possessed a <br />premaxillary frenum and only 1 fish without barbels possessed a pre- <br />maxillary frenum. Pelvic fins were absent in 4.1 % of 74 fish examined. <br /> <br />RELATIONSHIPS AND DIAGNOSIS. Hubbs (1943) interpreted <br />a subspecies as any genetic form which shows reasonable geographical <br />or ecological consistency, and which can usually be distinguished on <br />its totality of characters. By these criteria, R. o. moapae, with its nu- <br /> <br />TABLE 1 <br /> <br />l'dorphometric comparison of Rhinichthys osculus moapae with R. o. robustus from <br />Big Shipley Spring, Diamond Valley, Nevada. lWean (in parentheses) <br />and range are given. <br /> <br />R. o. rolJustus* <br /> <br />R. o. moapae <br /> <br />Standard length (mm) <br />Head deptht <br />Predorsallength <br />Anal to caudal length <br />Greatest body depth <br />Caudal peduncle depth <br />Depressed dorsal fin length <br />Caudal fin length <br /> <br />31-37 (34) <br />185-218(198) <br />558-623(591) <br />303-354(330) <br />247-283(263) <br />127-154(136) <br />208-243(224) <br />246-292(259) <br /> <br />42-77 (53) <br />129-166(146) <br />481-575(510) <br />323-483(394) <br />183-253(214) <br />91-126(109) <br />223-298(258) <br />229-305 (271) <br /> <br />- DilLa from Hubbs ct aJ. (1974). <br />";- :\I(~asurements in thousandths of standa.rd length. <br /> <br />514 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.