My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8226
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8226
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:38:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8226
Author
Shelton, L. R.
Title
Field Guide for Collecting and Processing Stream-Water Samples for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
94-445,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OVERVIEW OF WATER-COLUMN STUDY DESIGN <br /> <br />Water-Column Studies in NA WQA focus on assessing physical and chemical characteristics of stream <br />water, including suspended sediment, dissolved solids, major ions and metals, nutrients, organic carbon, <br />and dissolved pesticides, and on relating these characteristics to hydrologic conditions, sources, and <br />transport. The sampling designs for Water-Column Studies rely on coordinated sampling of varying <br />intensity and scope at two general types of sites, Integrator Sites and Indicator Sites. Integrator Sites are <br />chosen to represent water-quality conditions of streams and rivers in heterogeneous large basins that often <br />are affected by complex combinations of land-use settings, point sources, and natural influences. Indicator <br />Sites, in contrast, are chosen to represent water-quality conditions of streams in relatively homogeneous <br />and usually smaller basins associated with specific individual environmental settings (for example, a <br />particular combination of land-use and geological setting). <br /> <br />Water-column conditions are assessed by three primary sampling strategies employed at the selected <br />Integrator and Indicator Sites: <br /> <br />1. Basic Fixed-Site assessments characterize the spatial and temporal distribution of general water- <br />quality and constituent transport in relation to hydrologic conditions and contaminant sources; <br /> <br />2. Intensive Fixed-Site assessments characterize seasonal and short-term temporal variability of <br />general water quality and constituent transport and determine the occurrence and seasonal patterns <br />in concentrations and transport of dissolved pesticides; and <br /> <br />3. Synoptic studies are investigations of the geographic distribution of selected water-quality <br />characteristics in greater detail during specific seasons and in relation to sources. <br /> <br />Site choices and sampling strategies for Basic Fixed Sites and Intensive Fixed Sites are particularly <br />important to the success of the stream-water design for national water-quality assessment because in this <br />part of the study design all components are integrated by a nationally consistent strategy in all Study <br />Units. The focus of this report is on field procedures for collecting and processing samples from Basic <br />Fixed Sites and Intensive Fixed Sites. <br /> <br />Each Study Unit typically has three to five integrator Basic Fixed Sites and four to eight indicator <br />Basic Fixed Sites. Intensive Fixed Sites usually are composed of one or two Integrator Sites and one to <br />four Indicator Sites. Samples are collected from each site at fixed intervals and at extreme flows. The <br />analytical strategy for samples collected at Basic Fixed Sites is summarized in table 1; the strategy for <br />samples collected at Intensive Fixed Sites is the same, but with the addition of laboratory analyses of <br />dissolved pesticides (table 2). <br /> <br />Overview of Water-Column Study Design 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.