My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9470
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9470
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9470
Author
Shiozawa, D. K., M. D. McKell, B. A. Miller and R. P. Evans.
Title
Genetic Assessment of four native fishes from the Colorado River drainages in western Colorado
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
the results of DNA analysis.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />with alcohol preservation, 15-25 cm is an ideal size range, but larger fish were frozen, although <br />the more large fish we froze, the more dry ice we needed and the less space we had in the <br />cooler(s) for additional collections. <br /> <br />3 . We attempted to collect between 15 and 30 fish per population. If the population <br />numbers seemed very low we collected fewer than our goal, as we are able to obtain data from a <br />sample size of 10-12. As a general rule, if fish cannot be collected from a population and mostly <br />fm clips are taken, it is still useful to have some whole specimen vouchers archived in the <br />museum for future study. For this, about 12 fish per population is adequate. <br /> <br />4. We killed the fish by overdosing them with MS222. <br /> <br />5. We wrapped several fish in a plastic bag and put them immediately on the dry ice. To <br />keep the fish from freezing together we placed one fish in the bottom of the bag, rolled the bag <br />around it, then added a second fish to the bag, etc. Fish placed next to dry ice tend to freeze on <br />one side only, so we periodically checked and rotated the fish to make sure they were completely <br />frozen. This was especially a concern with large fish. Dry ice was kept on top of the fish since it <br />freezes material beneath it better than it does material above it. <br /> <br />6. We prepared labels and enclosed one with each bag of specimens, and placed the entire <br />sample (all specimens) into a single bag and labeled the outside of that bag as well. The labels <br />included the following information. <br /> <br />Collector(s): <br />Date: <br />Stream: <br />County: <br />State: <br />Drainage: <br />Number of specimens: <br /> <br />Field Sampling Notes <br /> <br />We sampled or obtained samples from 27 locations in western Colorado (Figure 1). These <br />excursions took place mainly during 2001, although several agencies provided us with samples <br />collected at other times as well. These 27 stations were assigned site codes (Table 1) to aid in <br />data manipulation and presentation after analysis. Below are field notes for the sampling trips. <br /> <br />Trip 1 <br />We began collecting trips to Colorado on August 1,2001. The field crew on the first trip <br />includedM. McKell, J. Kauwe, C. Young, andE. McLaughlin. The first stream selected <br />appeared on the map as a major tributary to the Yampa, the Little Snake River. We chose a site <br />on BLM land at County Road 26, Moffat County. The river at this site, however, was shallow <br />with a sand and gravel substrate. We observed numerous small fish in the shallow, extensive <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.