Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />DOWNSTREAM RIVER CHANNEL CHANGES FROM <br />DIVERSIONS OR RESERVOIR CONSTRUCTION <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Daryl B. Simons <br />Director, Engineering Research Center and Professor, Civil Engineering, <br />Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br /> <br />River systems are an integral part of the fluvial ecosystem. <br />Streamfl ows, sedi ment tran sport rates, and channe 1 morphology refl ect <br />the major responses resulting from river utilization activities. <br />Knowledge of river mechanics, geomorphology, and watershed management is <br />essential for formulating and selecting design alternatives by planners <br />or engineers or both. The basic principles affecting the dynamics and <br />response of streams to natural conditions or manmade alterations, or <br />both, are not generally covered in college curricula, particularly at <br />the undergraduate level. An understanding of stream mechanics is <br />necessary for the proper p 1 ann i ng and design of any channel change. <br />Thi s is particuhrly true of work in natural streams that carry heavy <br />sediment loads. Analysis using principles of stream mechanics, that is <br />a dynamic approach as compared to a static, rigid boundary approach, <br />provides a more realistic understanding of channel response to man- <br />induced changes. In response to this need, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service organized a workshop on the response of river systems to major <br />impoundments or flow diversions. <br /> <br />This workshop assembled 20 of the world's most qualified <br />individuals to discuss solutions to downstream problems stemming from <br />hypothetical impoundments or diversions, or both, on three selected <br />Western United States rivers. The participants were chosen from varied <br />disciplines including geology, geomorphology, river mechanics, erosion <br />and sedimentation, hydraulics, hydrology, fisheries and aquatic biology, <br />and water quality. Each of the participants was an expert in one of <br />these areas and possessed some understanding of all topics to facilitate <br />a productive exchange of ideas. <br /> <br />Results of this workshop include this set of proceedings composed <br />of reports prepared by the 20 participants along with reporters' <br />comments and workshop summaries. These reports describe how each author <br />perceives the problem of river response and determines a solution to a <br />set of hypothetical man-induced changes. Reports were submitted before <br />the workshop, reviewed within the group of workshop participants, and <br />revi sed and resubmi tted by the authors after the workshop. <br /> <br /> <br />The workshop offered a unique opportunity for a group of highly <br />qualified people to present, exchange and discuss concepts, theories, <br />and methodologies regarding the response of river systems to various <br />types of development. The primary objective of the workshop was this <br />set of papers which covers a wide spectrum of viewpoints and was <br /> <br />