My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1400 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
1400 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:37:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
1400
Author
Simons, D. B., et al., ed.
Title
Proceedings
USFW Year
1980.
USFW - Doc Type
Workshop on Downstream River Channel Changes Resulting From Diversions or Reservoir Construction.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />It is obvious from the geology of the area that these meanders are <br />en~renched meanders different from the conventional meanders in alluvial <br />plains. This contention was also supported by the finding that the <br />observed meander characteristics did not show any correlation with the <br />dominant discharge at Deer10dge Park. The hydrograph at Deerlodge Park <br />was prepared by adding the mean monthly discharges of the corresponding <br />months from the Little Snake River and the Yampa River, and the dominant <br />discharge was taken as 8900 cfs. <br /> <br />The meander data were then compared with some of the available <br />relationships for entrenched meanders. According to Bates, MB is given <br /> <br />by Equation 1 while Inglis suggested the use of Equation 2 for MB. <br /> <br />Me = 30.8 Ws <br />Me = 27.30 Ws <br /> <br />(1) <br />(2) <br /> <br />The relationships for ML given by Inglis and Dury are given by <br /> <br />Equations 3 and 4 respectively. <br /> <br />ML = 11.45 Ws <br />ML = 7 to 10 Ws <br /> <br />(3) <br />(4) <br /> <br />In the above equations Ws is the bankful width of the river. <br /> <br />In estimating the values of Me and ML from the above relationships, <br /> <br />the value of Ws was taken as the width of the river. The values of MB <br /> <br />obtained from Equations 1 and 2 were in general 3 to 4 times larger than <br />the actual values; on the other hand, the values of ML obtained from <br /> <br />Equations 3 and 4 were. comparable with the actual values only for a few <br />meander loops. Figure 2 shows the variation of ML with R for the <br /> <br />obser~ed values. On this figure, the relationship between ML and R for <br /> <br />entrenched meanders proposed by Young (1974) has also been plotted for <br />comparison. It can be seen that, on the average the Yampa River data <br />follow Young's relationship. <br /> <br />The study of the topographic features of the Yampa River a 150 <br />indicates the presence of cliffs more than a thousand feet high espe- <br />cially on the inside bends of the entrenched meanders. Thus, the <br />meanders are more or less confined within the high vertical walls of the <br />river with little possibility of their lateral migration. The general <br />meander pattern is, therefore, unlikely to be affected by any variations <br />in discharge. <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />. 14 "'-lfl "~-,,,- ~~ (;, ,---" ~..,~~~<:. Y-;/to,..-; :" ., I!'> L;~ ~..: "~",- ",~:, "'"" L,I,H,;~ ~~~ ""~"" t" 'f 'I} " , ~,." " r _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.