Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l'- <br />~ <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />Outflow rates of the reservoir <br />Geometry of the reservoir <br />Water transparency to solar radiation <br />Water temperature <br />Time and periods of breaking and forming of the ice cover <br /> <br />As with the workshop data packages, the available data will seldom <br />satisfy the requirements of this data list. However, appropriate <br />methods of synthesi s can be used to supply necessary data from a <br />secondary data base. In general, these data can be classified as 1) <br />data essential to conduct the proposed study, 2) data that are available <br />on existing records, 3) data that can be synthesized by theory or <br />extrapolated from adjacent basins, and 4) data that must be collected to <br />supplement the existing data and proposed synthesized data to add to the <br />v~lidity and accuracy of the study. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />There was general agreement among the workshop participants <br />concerning the critical problems and data needs for assessing downstream <br />channel change. The scope of the analyses provided in the papers which <br />follow was influenced by the time available for study, the data <br />provided, and the absence of a site visit to the study area. As a <br />result participants generally attempted only a qualitative analysis, but <br />many papers outline procedures for more detailed quantitative studies. <br /> <br />The details of the approaches selected by each participant vary <br />based on the individual's training and experience. There are, however, <br />striking commonalities which highlight the state-of-the-art of river <br />system analysis. <br /> <br />Regime theory and concepts of dynamic equilibrium are used widely <br />as a basis for qualitative assessment of river response to development. <br />The concepts of fluvial geomorphology derived from Lane and Schumm are <br />also pervasive. All participants relied heavily on experience, and many <br />supplemented their analysis with case study data derived from comparable <br />physiographic settings. It was generally agreed that hydraulic <br />engineering projects can induce major changes in the hydrologic, <br />hydraulic, and sediment regimes of river systems, and at present, theory <br />alone is not capable of predicting this complex response. Research <br />effort committed to producing documented case studies can provide an <br />important resource for evaluating river response. Post-project monitor- <br />ing and analysis should be supported by agencies responsible for river <br />system development and control. <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, :-C";\~lH'f.'.ti:.~"".~~l~~,"",;,)~':-:'. <br /> <br />".Io~,..$l~~~"I~~"JftfP'!>-- ,"!'""""'f <br /> <br />