Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />assigned to identify key issues, and prepare a summary of problem <br />percept; on and sol ut; on approach employed by the part i ci pants in each <br />group. <br /> <br />The workshop concluded with a joint session to consider the <br />reporter1s summaries and complete any unfinished discussion. This final <br />session concentrated on research needs in the area of river response and <br />a discussion of possible alternative approaches to the problem of making <br />the basic techniques of analysis of river response available to <br />professionals not trained specifically in river mechanics or river <br />engineering. <br /> <br />In organizing these proceedings an attempt has been made to adhere <br />to the format of the workshop and, insofar as possible, convey the <br />dynamics and "flavor" of the sessions. A brief statement of the work- <br />shop problems as posed to the participants ;s followed by a general <br />summary of the results of the proceedings. Papers, revised and <br />resubmi tted after the workshop, are presented in the order di scussed: <br />Yampa R;ver, Poplar Creek, and Elk River. Each set of papers is <br />pre<;eded by the reporter I s summary presented at the fi na 1 workshop <br />session. Finally, a set of appendices contains detailed information <br />drawn from the data packages prov; ded to part; c; pants for each of the <br />three rivers analyzed. <br /> <br />3 <br />