My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9553
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9553
Author
Valdez, R. A. and R. T. Muth
Title
Ecology and Conservation of Native Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
2005
USFW - Doc Type
American Fisheries Society Symposium
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF NATNE F1SHES IN THE UPPER COLORADO RiVER BASIN <br /> <br />189 <br /> <br />· a genetic refuge is maintained in the lower <br />basin. <br /> <br />Use of hatchery fish is vital to recovery of <br />bonytail. A broodstock has been developed from a <br />small number of wild fish that is believed to repre- <br />sent the wild genome for establishment of new popu- <br />lations (Minckley et al. 1989), and fish are being <br />successfully cultured in hatcheries (Hamman 1985). <br />Initial releases oflarge fish into the wild were un- <br />successful (Chart and Cranney 1991), but smaller <br />fish released more recently are being recaptured af- <br />ter 1-2 years in the river, indicating good growth <br />and survival in the wild. Specific life history aspects <br />ofbonytail are unknown, such as habitat require- <br />ments. It is hypothesized that bonytail use inundated <br />floodplains as nursery areas and that restoration of <br />these habitats will benefit most native species. <br /> <br />Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />According to the 2002 recovery goals (U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service 2002d), recommended criteria for <br />recovery and long-term conservation of razorback <br />sucker are: <br />1. Finalization and implementation of site- <br />specific management tasks to minimize or <br />remove threats to attain necessary levels of <br />protection. <br />2. Establishment and maintenance of four ge- <br />netically and demographically viable, self- <br />sustaining populations, two in the lower <br />Colorado River basin and two in the upper <br />basin; one each in the Green River subbasin <br />and upper Colorado River subbasin, as well <br />as the San Juan River subbasin, if target <br />numbers are not met in the upper Colorado <br />River subbasin. Each population is main <br />tained such that: <br />· trends in annual adult (age 4+) point esti- <br />mates do not decline significantly, <br />· mean estimated recruitment of age-3 natu- <br />rally produced fish equals or exceeds aver- <br />age annual adult mortaliry, <br />· annual point estimates for each of the four <br />populations exceed 5,800 adults, and <br />· a genetic refuge is maintained in Lake <br />Mohave. <br /> <br />The population of the middle Green River in <br />1999 was fewer than 100 wild adults, and numbers <br />of wild fish throughout the upper basin are few and <br />scattered. Large numbers of hatchery fish have been <br />released in the upper basin since 1995 to augment <br />wild populations and some of these fish have been <br />recaptured as ripe adults on an established spawn- <br />ing bar in the middle Green River. Increased col- <br />lection oflarvae in the Green River and first collec- <br />tions oflarvae in the Gunnison River indicate suc- <br />cessful reproduction by the stocked fish. <br />The principal reason for decline of razorback <br />sucker in the upper basin is believed to be reduced <br />availability of floodplains that are used by all life <br />stages and serve as nurseries for larvae emerging from <br />mid-channel cobble bars during spring runoff. <br />Levees have been breached to allow the river to con- <br />nect and inundate these floodplains during critical <br />larval stages and some recruitment is evident. flood- <br />plain management plans for the Green River <br />subbasin (Valdez and Nelson 2004) and the upper <br />Colorado River subbasin (Valdez and Nelson 2005) <br />provide guidance and strategies for maximizing <br />available floodplain habitat. Implementation of flow <br />recommendations is necessary to floodplain restora- <br />tion so that releases from Flaming Gorge Dam can <br />coincide with Yampa River flows to maximize flood- <br />ing over breached levees. The current strategy al- <br />lows floodplains to become inundated seasonally for <br />2-3 flood cycles to allow for entrainment oflarvae <br />and 1-2 years of growth that minimizes the threat <br />of predation by large main-stem predators. Tests with <br />hatchery-reared fish stocked in floodplains show <br />good growth and moderate survival (Birchell and <br />Christopherson 2004). The alternative strategy of <br />repatriation by isolating floodplains and removing <br />or poisoning nonnative fish before release of hatch- <br />ery razorback sucker (Minckley et al. 2003) is not <br />currently being used in the upper basin. <br /> <br />Kendall Warm Springs Dace <br /> <br />The only population of Kendall Warm Springs dace is <br />extremely localized and prospects for recovery and long- <br />term conservation of this species have been greatly im- <br />proved with establishment of the Kendall Warm <br />Springs Biological Management Unit. The unit is sur- <br />rounded with fencing that protects the springs, stream, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.