My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9553
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9553
Author
Valdez, R. A. and R. T. Muth
Title
Ecology and Conservation of Native Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
2005
USFW - Doc Type
American Fisheries Society Symposium
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF NATIVE FISHES IN THE UPPER COLORADO RivER BASIN <br /> <br />187 <br /> <br />Conservation populations continue to be found <br /> <br />mainly in short headwater stream sections. <br /> <br />Rangewide Conservation Agreement for <br />Roundtail Chub, Flannelmouth Sucker, and <br />Bluehead Sucker <br /> <br />Six basin states signed a conservation agreement in <br />2004 (Colorado Fish and Wildlife Council 2004) to <br />expedite implementation of conservation measures for <br />roundtail chub, flannelmouth sucker, and bluehead <br />sucker, and to ensure persistence of these species <br />throughout their ranges. Signatories include Arizona, <br />Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyo- <br />ming. Each state will develop conservation and man- <br />agement strategies for any or all three species that <br />occur naturally within its authority. Each signatory <br />agrees to (a) develop and finalize a conservation and <br />management strategy, (b) establish and/or maintain <br />populations of all three species to ensure persistence, <br />(c) establish and/or maintain viable metapopulations, <br />and (d) identifY, significantly reduce, and eliminate <br />threats. It is believed that conservation actions to pro- <br />tect and enhance these species and their habitats will <br />contribute to conservation of other native fISh species <br />with similar distributions. <br /> <br />Conservation and Recovery <br />Prospects <br /> <br />Colorado Pikeminnow <br /> <br />According to the 2002 recovery goals (U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service 2002a), recommended crite- <br />ria for recovery and long-term conservation of <br />bonytail are: <br /> <br />1. Finalization and implementation of site- <br />specific management tasks to minimize or <br />remove threats to attain necessary levels of <br />protection. <br />2. Maintenance of an upper basin metapopu- <br />lation with two genetically and demo- <br />graphically viable, self-sustaining popula- <br />tions, one each in the Green River subbasin <br />and upper Colorado River subbasin, as well <br />as the San Juan River subbasin, if target <br />numbers are not met in the upper Colo- <br /> <br />rado River subbasin. Each population is <br />maintained such that: <br />· trends in annual adult (age 7 +) point esti- <br />mates do not decline significantly, <br />· mean estimated recruitment of age- 5 and <br />age-6 naturally produced fish equals or <br />exceeds average annual adult mortality, <br />and <br />· each annual point estimate for the Green <br />River subbasin exceeds 2,600 adults. <br /> <br />Habitat of Colorado pikeminnow in the lower <br />basin is too fragmented and modified to allow <br />completion oflife history needs, and recovery of this <br />species in the upper basin is believed to provide long- <br />term species viability. <br />Colorado pikeminnow persist as self-sustain- <br />ing populations in the Green River and upper <br />Colorado River subbasins, and concerted efforts <br />are underway to restore the species in the San Juan <br />River subbasin. Preliminary numbers of adults in <br />819 km of the Green River subbasin range from <br />about 2,300 in 2003 to 3,100 in 2001; and from <br />about 450 in 1992 to 780 in 2003 in 282 km of <br />the upper Colorado River subbasin. Numbers of <br />young and juveniles vary within and between years. <br />Populations in the Green River and upper Colo- <br />rado River subbasins increased following a series <br />of wet years during 1983-1986, and a popula- <br />tion viability analysis declared that the species was <br />viable for 200 years (Gilpin 1993). Similar pulses <br />in recruitment were seen following subsequent <br />high water years (e.g., 1993). These population in- <br />creases appear linked to high water years, and are <br />attributed to high channel reshaping flows that di- <br />versified habitat, cleansed the substrate of sediment, <br />infused large amounts of food into the river, and <br />diminished nonnative fish populations (Osmundson <br />and Burnham 1998). Reoperation of Flaming <br />Gorge Dam at about the same time provided less <br />fluctuating flows in summer that stabilized nurs- <br />ery backwaters and increased survival of young. An <br />apparent recent decline in Colorado pikeminnow <br />remains unexplained but may be attributed to pe- <br />riods oflow flows since the late 1980s and drought <br />conditions since 2000. This drought has allowed <br />increases in nonnative predatory fish, and popula- <br />tions of most native fish have declined (Anderson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.