Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF NATIVE FISHES IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />173 <br /> <br />genetic purity ratings ofB, B+, A- or A (i.e., slightly <br />hybridized to essentially pure) are defined as con- <br />servation populations for which management ac- <br />tions are implemented, and in 2003 included to- <br />tals ofl,648 km (1,024 stream miles) and 455 ha <br />(1,124 acres oflakes). These results show that both <br />pure and essentially pure populations are still <br />present in many waters in Utah, Colorado, and <br />Wyoming. <br />Spawning occurs in spring in streams and tribu- <br />tary inflows, and eggs hatch in 28-40 d at 8-12 oc. <br />Colorado River cutthroat trout feed largely on plank- <br />ton throughout life, and their growth is slower than <br />that of Yellowstone cutthroat trout 0. clarkii <br />bouvieri. Maximum growth in Trapper's Lake was <br />in midsummer (Drummond 1966). Colorado River <br />cutthroat trout is susceptible to common salmonid <br />diseases, especially whirling disease Myxobolus <br />cerebralis (Nehring 1998). Transmission of diseases <br />to wild populations by hatchery stocks is recognized <br />as the most significant threat, and policies and regu- <br />lations in Wyoming and Utah address fish health <br />status, disease certification of stocked and imported <br />fish, and stocking protocols. Fish testing positive for <br />whirling disease in Utah and Wyoming hatcheries <br />are not stocked, and in Colorado, a policy clearly <br />designates native cutthroat trout waters and other <br />wild trout habitats that are negative for whirling <br />disease as the most protected category. <br /> <br />Threats to Native Fishes <br /> <br />The following threat descriptions apply primarily <br />to endangered and other native fishes in the main <br />rivers and tributaries of the upper basin. Threats to <br />the Kendall Warm Springs dace and Colorado River <br />cutthroat trout are described under Current Status <br />and Ecology and Species Comervation Programs. <br /> <br />Flow Regulation and Diversion <br /> <br />Flow regulation in the upper basin began in the mid- <br />1800s as small tributary impoundments and irriga- <br />tion diversions. Ratification of the Colorado River <br />Compact of 1922 by the seven basin states divided <br />the Colorado River into upper and lower basins and <br />allocated 7.5 million acre-feet ofwater to each basin, <br /> <br />based on estimated annual flow of 16.8 million acre- <br />feet for the period 1896-1921 (Fradkin 1981; <br />Reisner 1986). However, average annual flow of the <br />Colorado River, 1922-1976, was only 13.9 million <br />acre-feet, and compact allocation was based on an <br />overestimate of available water. The Upper Basin <br />Compact of 1948 further apportioned water to each <br />of the upper basin states by percentage of available <br />annual volume (i.e., Colorado, 51.75%; Utah, 23%; <br />Wyoming, 14%; New Mexico, 11.25%). All seven <br />basin states faced the problem of constructing costly <br />storage and delivery systems to realize their full com- <br />pact allocation. <br />Completion of Boulder (Hoover) Dam in <br />1935 marked the beginning of dam construction <br />on the Colorado River. Thirteen main-stem dams <br />regulate flow of the Colorado River and hundreds <br />of smaller dams control virtually every stream in <br />the basin. Major dams in the upper basin include <br />Flaming Gorge on the Green River; Blue Mesa, <br />Morrow Point, and Crystal (Aspinall Unit) on the <br />Gunnison River; Dillon, Green Mountain, Shadow <br />Mountain, and Ruedi on tributaries of the upper <br />Colorado River; McPhee on the Dolores River; <br />Taylor Draw on the White River; and Glen Can- <br />yon on the main-stem upper Colorado River. The <br />larger dams were completed in the early 1960s <br />under authority of the Colorado River Storage <br />Project Act of 1956. Glen Canyon Dam is the larg- <br />est in the upper basin and is located 25 km up- <br />stream of Lees Ferry, the Compact dividing point <br />between upper and lower basins. Annual discharge <br />from the upper basin at Lees Ferry exceeded 18 <br />million acre-feet in 1929, and lowest discharge was <br />only 4.4 million acre-feet in 1934. <br />The historic upper basin was characterized by <br />dramatic ann ual and seasonal flow variation (i.e., ex- <br />ceptionally high flows in spring and early summer, <br />and lower flows in late summer through winter). Flows <br />typically began rising in March with low elevation <br />snowmelt, were highest in late May and early June <br />with snowmelt runoff, receded in late June and July, <br />and were relatively low and stable from August <br />through March, except for flow spikes from periodic <br />storms. Year-to-year flow variation depends on moun- <br />tain snowpack. Historic average annual flow at Lees <br />Ferry, 1922-1962, was highly variable from about <br />