Laserfiche WebLink
<br />jz <br /> <br />f <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br /> <br />Fish larvae were first caught in the drift nets in late July when the <br />main channel water temperature first reached 16 C, during a rapid warming <br />trend (Fig. 3). This was accompanied by a decrease in river discharge from <br />a peak of 28,300 cfs (cubic feet per second) on June 26 to about 10,000 cfs <br />on July 20. The maximum drift ot' 1.91 fish per 1000 cfw was seen during the <br />week of July 25-31, when water temperature varied from 16 to 17 C and <br />discharge was about 9,750 cfs. <br /> <br />During the second week of high drift density of 1.65 fish per 1000 cfw, <br />water temperatures ranged from 17 to 18 C, and discharge averaged 8230 cfs. <br />In the third week of high drift density of 1.21 fish (August 8-14), water <br />temperatures ranged from 18 to 20 C and discharge averaged 7375 cfs. Drift <br />decreased dramatically when the average midchannel water temperature <br />exceeded 20 C. Either the fish actively avoided these temperatures during <br />drift or the numbers of available drifting fish was depleted. <br /> <br />Diel Dri ft <br /> <br />Daily sampling by 4-hour periods, for most of the 9-week study. <br />revealed a definite pattern in diel drift (Fig. 4). Highest drift rates at <br />the Parachute Site (1.05 fish per 1000 cfw) occurred during the period 2000 <br />to 2400 hours, while the lowest density (0.25 fish) occurred in the <br />preceeding period of 1600 to 2000 hours. Although this represents a four- <br />fold increase in drift density, analysis of variance revealed no significant <br />differences (p)0.05) between any time periods. <br /> <br />The largest numbers of drifting larvae were noted during very dark <br />evenings (2000-2400 hours) preceeding the appearance of a full moon. This <br />observation and the high night-time drift densities suggest that the larval <br />fishes are photosensitive, and many are actively capable of. entering and <br />escaping the surface drift currents. The absence of a significant diel drift <br />pattern may be attributed to the effect of frequent turbidity and sediment <br />load on instream light penetration and intensity. Gale and Mohr (1978) <br />speculated that riverine larval fish drift during high levels of turbidity <br />among floating particles and debris to avoid high light intensity and <br />coincidentally escape detection by predators. Geen et a1. (1966) found white <br />suckers drifting primarily on very dark nights and in turbid water. <br /> <br />The lack of significance in diel drift at the Parachute Site may also <br />be attributed to pooling of samples collected over a 9-week period. This <br />caused high seasonal variation in densities and thus, high diel variation. <br />To reduce thi s effect, the d i el sampl e effort at the Pal i sade Site was <br />designed to sample drift over a short time period (see Results of Palisade <br />Study) . <br /> <br />Length Of Drifting Fishes <br /> <br />A comparison of the sizes and developmental phases of larvae collected <br />in drift nets with those collected concurrently in shoreline seine hauls <br />indicates that, for certain species, only a well-defined size group was <br /> <br />177 <br />