Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ira <br /> <br />Small-mesh dri ft nets des i gned to capture dri ft i ng ichthyofauna were <br />first used in the rivers of the upper basin to locate spawning areas of <br />endangered fish species. Haynes et al. (1984) first conducted drift studies <br />in the Upper Colorado River within Colorado and in the Yampa River, starting <br />in 1979; and Radant et ale (1983) used drift nets in the White River as <br />part of the Colorado squawfish investigations within the state of Utah. The <br />increase in water withdra\'Ials, flow modifications, and hydropower projects <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin prompt the need to more thoroughly <br />describe the phenomenon of ichthyofaunal drift in that system. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />This paper describes two independent studies of larval fish drift in <br />the Upper Colorado River. The first, conducted in 1983, was designed to <br />assess the potential impact of a midchannel water intake structure near <br />Parachute, Colorado (Fig. 1). The second study was conducted in 1984, about <br />35 river miles downstream, to assess the potential impact of a small, <br />shoreline, hydropower project near Palisade, Colorado. The findings of the <br />two studies are synthesi zed in thi s treatment because of the similarity in <br />results. <br /> <br />Both studies were conducted from mid-June to early September. Five <br />gear types were used at each study site, including large-mesh seines to <br />document adult and juvenile species composition; small-mesh seines, dip nets <br />and light traps to assess the composition of non-drifting larvae and young- <br />of-the-year along shorelines and in shallow areas; and drift nets to assess <br />species composition and relative densities of drifting larvae. Tow nets <br />were also used at the Parachute Site to assess midchannel surface drift, and <br />boat el ectrofi shi ng was used at the Pal i sade Si te to further document adul t <br />and juvenile species composition. <br /> <br />The drift nets used were made of 560 micron mesh Nitex plankton <br />netting. Each net had a rectangular opening of 30.48 x 45.72 cm and a <br />length of 3 m, which tapered to a removable collection cup. Each net was <br />set with the open end facing directly into the current. The top of each net <br />was even with the surface of the water, except for paired, stacked sets to <br />assess vertical drift distribution. Time, water temperature, and velocity <br />were recorded when each dri ft net was set and removed. The total vol ume of <br />water filtered by each net was computed to provide estimates of larval <br />densities, according to the following equation:.---- <br /> <br />Ne = (N/(A x Vm x T)) x 1000 <br /> <br />where: Ne = estimated number of drifting fish in 1000 cubic feet of <br />wa ter , <br />N = actual number of fish recovered from the drift sample, <br />A = area of net opening in square feet (1.5), <br />Vm average water vel oc ity in feet per second at the net <br />opening during the set, (initial + ending)/2, and <br />T = total time of set in seconds. <br /> <br />172 <br />