Laserfiche WebLink
<br />!..HfO <br />, I I I <br /> <br />1,\ U 5 ; ct d L <br />I <br /> <br />North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:848-855, 1999 <br />@ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1999 <br /> <br />L);-i 71' <br /> <br />Effects of Invasive Tissue Collection on <br />Rainbow Trout, Razorback Sucker, and Bonytail Chub <br /> <br />HAROLD M. TYUS*l <br /> <br />Colorado River Fishes Project, U,S, Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />1680 West Highway 40, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA <br /> <br />WAYNE C. STARNES <br /> <br />North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, <br />Post Office Box 29555, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626, USA <br /> <br />CATHERINE A. KARp2 <br /> <br />Colorado River Fishes Project, U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service, <br />1680 West Highway 40, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA <br /> <br />JAMES R SAUNDERS III <br /> <br />Center for Limnology, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, <br />University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0216, USA <br /> <br />Abstract,-Histological examination and biochemical <br />assays of fish tissues are used for disease detection, ge- <br />netic characterizations, contaminant analyses, and the <br />detection of stable isotopes. However, tissue sampling <br />usually requires invasive sampling procedures that may <br />harm or kill an organism under investigation, For this <br />reason, invasive procedures are rarely used with threat- <br />ened, endangered, or other sensitive species, If invasive <br />tissue sampling could be performed with little harm, a <br />wide array of sophisticated techniques could be em- <br />ployed to assist in protection and management of species <br />in decline, We subjected rainbow trout Oncorhynchus <br />mykiss to nonlethal invasive sampling of fin, muscle, and <br />liver tissue, Techniques first developed for trout were <br />applied to two endangered fishes, razorback sucker Xy- <br />rauchen texanus and bony tail chub Gila elegans, Acute <br />(mortality) and chronic (suppression of growth rate) ef- <br />fects of tissue removal were evaluated in a hatchery for <br />control and treatment groups of experimental fishes, No <br />mortality was attributable to tissue sampling in any of <br />the three species, and there were no significant differ- <br />ences in growth rates between control and treatment <br />groups in rainbow trout or razorback sucker, Bony tail <br />chub experienced high mortality due to an outbreak of <br />disease that precluded an evaluation of chronic effects, <br />but there was no indication that survivorship was de- <br />creased due to tissue sampling, With recent advances in <br />use of small tissue samples, these nonlethal invasive <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />* Corresponding author: harold,tyus@colorado.edu <br />1 Present address: Center for Limnology, Cooperative <br />Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Uni- <br />versity of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado 80309-0221, <br />USA. <br />2 Present address: Fisheries Applications Research <br />Group, U,S, Bureau of Reclamation, Post Office Box <br />25007, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA, <br /> <br />Received May I, 1998; accepted March 12, 1999 <br /> <br />methods can make a variety of tissues available for his- <br />tological evaluation, genetic characterization, or bio- <br />chemical assay without sacrifice of valuable fish, <br /> <br />Tissue samples have routinely been used for his- <br />tological examination and biochemical assays, <br />providing infonnation about fish disease, genetic <br />composition, levels of contaminants, and relative <br />concentration of stable isotopes. In the past, most <br />of these evaluations have relied on large amounts <br />of tissues that required the individual be sacrificed, <br />However, recent technological developments have <br />enabled use of relatively small tissue samples. For <br />example, genetic assessments using polymerase <br />chain reaction requires only tiny amounts of tissue <br />to "amplify" pieces of DNA (Whitmore et a1. <br />1992; Simon et a1. 1994; Hillis et a1. 1996), Con- <br />taminants and stable isotopic studies have previ- <br />ously relied on use of ground-up whole fish or <br />large fillets (e,g" Lowe et al, 1985; Schmitt et al. <br />1985; Hesslein et al, 1991). The amount of tissues <br />currently required for these evaluations has also <br />been greatly reduced due to better techniques and <br />detection technology (Waddell and May 1995; Fry <br />et a1. 1996), <br />Noninvasive, nonlethal techniques are highly <br />desirable for obtaining tissue samples because re- <br />petitive samples can be taken from the same in- <br />dividual over time and a large number of samples <br />can be taken from fish populations with little or <br />no mortality, The latter is especially important <br />when dealing with endangered or other valuable <br />species, and a variety of tissues might be satis- <br /> <br />848 <br />