<br />!..HfO
<br />, I I I
<br />
<br />1,\ U 5 ; ct d L
<br />I
<br />
<br />North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:848-855, 1999
<br />@ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1999
<br />
<br />L);-i 71'
<br />
<br />Effects of Invasive Tissue Collection on
<br />Rainbow Trout, Razorback Sucker, and Bonytail Chub
<br />
<br />HAROLD M. TYUS*l
<br />
<br />Colorado River Fishes Project, U,S, Fish and Wildlife Service,
<br />1680 West Highway 40, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA
<br />
<br />WAYNE C. STARNES
<br />
<br />North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences,
<br />Post Office Box 29555, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626, USA
<br />
<br />CATHERINE A. KARp2
<br />
<br />Colorado River Fishes Project, U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service,
<br />1680 West Highway 40, Vernal, Utah 84078, USA
<br />
<br />JAMES R SAUNDERS III
<br />
<br />Center for Limnology, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
<br />University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0216, USA
<br />
<br />Abstract,-Histological examination and biochemical
<br />assays of fish tissues are used for disease detection, ge-
<br />netic characterizations, contaminant analyses, and the
<br />detection of stable isotopes. However, tissue sampling
<br />usually requires invasive sampling procedures that may
<br />harm or kill an organism under investigation, For this
<br />reason, invasive procedures are rarely used with threat-
<br />ened, endangered, or other sensitive species, If invasive
<br />tissue sampling could be performed with little harm, a
<br />wide array of sophisticated techniques could be em-
<br />ployed to assist in protection and management of species
<br />in decline, We subjected rainbow trout Oncorhynchus
<br />mykiss to nonlethal invasive sampling of fin, muscle, and
<br />liver tissue, Techniques first developed for trout were
<br />applied to two endangered fishes, razorback sucker Xy-
<br />rauchen texanus and bony tail chub Gila elegans, Acute
<br />(mortality) and chronic (suppression of growth rate) ef-
<br />fects of tissue removal were evaluated in a hatchery for
<br />control and treatment groups of experimental fishes, No
<br />mortality was attributable to tissue sampling in any of
<br />the three species, and there were no significant differ-
<br />ences in growth rates between control and treatment
<br />groups in rainbow trout or razorback sucker, Bony tail
<br />chub experienced high mortality due to an outbreak of
<br />disease that precluded an evaluation of chronic effects,
<br />but there was no indication that survivorship was de-
<br />creased due to tissue sampling, With recent advances in
<br />use of small tissue samples, these nonlethal invasive
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />~
<br />* Corresponding author: harold,tyus@colorado.edu
<br />1 Present address: Center for Limnology, Cooperative
<br />Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Uni-
<br />versity of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado 80309-0221,
<br />USA.
<br />2 Present address: Fisheries Applications Research
<br />Group, U,S, Bureau of Reclamation, Post Office Box
<br />25007, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA,
<br />
<br />Received May I, 1998; accepted March 12, 1999
<br />
<br />methods can make a variety of tissues available for his-
<br />tological evaluation, genetic characterization, or bio-
<br />chemical assay without sacrifice of valuable fish,
<br />
<br />Tissue samples have routinely been used for his-
<br />tological examination and biochemical assays,
<br />providing infonnation about fish disease, genetic
<br />composition, levels of contaminants, and relative
<br />concentration of stable isotopes. In the past, most
<br />of these evaluations have relied on large amounts
<br />of tissues that required the individual be sacrificed,
<br />However, recent technological developments have
<br />enabled use of relatively small tissue samples. For
<br />example, genetic assessments using polymerase
<br />chain reaction requires only tiny amounts of tissue
<br />to "amplify" pieces of DNA (Whitmore et a1.
<br />1992; Simon et a1. 1994; Hillis et a1. 1996), Con-
<br />taminants and stable isotopic studies have previ-
<br />ously relied on use of ground-up whole fish or
<br />large fillets (e,g" Lowe et al, 1985; Schmitt et al.
<br />1985; Hesslein et al, 1991). The amount of tissues
<br />currently required for these evaluations has also
<br />been greatly reduced due to better techniques and
<br />detection technology (Waddell and May 1995; Fry
<br />et a1. 1996),
<br />Noninvasive, nonlethal techniques are highly
<br />desirable for obtaining tissue samples because re-
<br />petitive samples can be taken from the same in-
<br />dividual over time and a large number of samples
<br />can be taken from fish populations with little or
<br />no mortality, The latter is especially important
<br />when dealing with endangered or other valuable
<br />species, and a variety of tissues might be satis-
<br />
<br />848
<br />
|