Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.290 <br />,il <br /> <br />. <br />J <br /> <br />The Southwestern Naturalist <br /> <br />vol. 29, no. 3 <br /> <br />August 1984 <br /> <br />Tyus and McAda-Squawfish Movements <br /> <br />291 <br /> <br />~ ! <br />N I <br />/ ----1 <br /> <br />UTAH <br /> <br /> <br />COLORADO <br /> <br />and have a life of about 6 months. All units transmined in the 40.660-40.700 MHz frequency <br />range. Each transminer had a unique signal (frequency vs pulse rate) so that individual fish <br />could be identified. Radio receiver sets used were Smith-Root RF-40 and SR-40 models. The RF <br />type enabled the investigator to identify any particular frequency transmined at 40 MHz. The SR <br />receiver was a "search" type and received all emined frequencies in the frequency range. <br />Omni-directional and pin-pointing type (bidirectional) antennas were employed. A Larson- <br />Kulrod whip antenna was used to search for implanted fish. This antenna was mounted on a <br />20 cm square steel plate elevated about 4 m above the water when mounted on a boat, or <br />mounted directly to an airplane, or helicopter strut. A Smith-Root loop antenna (directional) was <br />used only to triangulate fish location, from boat or shore. <br />It was necessary to use aircraft to keep contact with several fish at one time. The most <br />slu:cessful aircrah used was a helicopter. since airplanes cannot rly safely in most canyon areas. <br />The radiotelemetry program utilized two different methods for recording information about <br />habitat preferences and movement. Long distance movement was determined by anempting to <br />locate all radiotagged fish on a 1-2 day interval. The location of a fish was recorded as a single <br />contact when encountered. In order to obtain specific information on movement and habitat <br />preferences, a die I sampling procedure was employed. Observations were made continuously over <br />a 24 hour basis as follows: I. Fish to be studied were selected by tag number from a table of <br />random digits. 2. Twenty-four hour day was divided into three eight-hour periods and one period <br />selected at random. A fish was then monitored during this period. If a fish remained stationary <br />for 30 minutes, then its location was recorded every 15 minutes, along with the water depth and <br />velocity, substrate type and habitat type. 3. After a fish had been monitored [or three eight-hour <br />periods, the [ish with the next consecutive tag number was then selected [or study. <br />The location of each radiotelemetered' fish was carefully fixed and recorded relative to the <br />distance upstream [rom the mouth o[ each river (river mouth = 0 km). If the fish remained in <br />one location for 30 minutes it was assumed this habitat was preferred and microhabitat <br />information was recorded, including the general habitat, substrate type, water depth and water <br />velocity. Water depth, velocity and substrate measurements were taken only when the [ish moved <br />to another location or at the end of the study period. These precautions were taken in order to <br />minimize disturbance to the fish. Water depth was recorded by direct mesurement with a wading <br />rod and water velocity was measured 0.6 o[ the distance from the water surface with a Marsh- <br />McBirney. current meter. Substrate type was obtained by direct observation and by feel. <br />The MANAGE data based management system developed by the FWS Western Energy and <br />Land Use Team (WELUT) in Fort Collins, Colorado was used [or storage, retrieval and <br />manipulation of the data (Shumate, et aI., 1981). <br /> <br />WYOMING <br /> <br />o <br />, <br /> <br />SCALE IN KILOMETERS <br />50 100 150 200 2~0 <br /> <br />50 100 150 <br />SCALE tN MILES <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />ARIZONA <br /> <br />t ------- <br />------ <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />NEW MEXICO <br /> <br />RESULTs.-Movement.- Three types of behavior were exhibited by the 31 <br />radio-implanted fish. One fish was used as a test animal early in 1980, It <br />was in poor condition when released and only monitored four days until <br />its recapture, after which it died. Its steady downstream movement was <br />indicative of its poor health and similar to the behavior of another <br />Colorado squawfish that moved downstream and was later found to be <br />dead. Of the remaining 29 Colorado squawfish only 15 were monitored for <br />.') months or more. These 15 fish exhibited two movement patterns: highly <br />mobile and sedentary. The total distance moved by 9 mobile fish averaged <br />338 km (Table I) and most of the movement occurred in mid-June through <br />July. Contact was lost with three of the six sedentary.fish for a month of <br />more during this time period and, since those fish could also have been <br />active during that period they were not classified as to movement pattern. <br />The remaining three fish were classified as sedentary and their total <br />movement averaged only 42 km (Table I) during the study period. <br />One Colorado squawfish from the sedentary group and one from the <br />mobile group were recaptured and dissected. The fish from the sedentary <br />group was a very immature male but the mobile fish was a female in an <br /> <br />FIG. I.-The Green River Basin. <br /> <br />After their capture, the Colorado squawfish were placed into a 200 mg/L solution of tricaine <br />methylsuHonate. When the fish were anesthesized, they were surgically implanted with <br />radiotransminer modules using a procedure similar to that of Bidgood (1980). Sutures were <br />individual (usually five) rather than the continuous suture used by Bidgood, and the incision was <br />made laterally, immediately anterior and slightly dorsal to the insertion of the right pelvic fin. <br />Implanted fish were held five days in 1980 in order to determine the results of the surgery. In <br />1981 the fish were released after implanting them in order to reduce stress (Hart and Summerfelt, <br />1975) associated with holding them. <br />Surgical implantation was completed with A VMo company and Smith-Root Company fish <br />transminer modules dipped in melted beeswax. These modules weighed approximately 10 to 20 <br />g respectively in air and about 3.5 to 6 g in water. The units are powered by mercury banerie, <br />