Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Southwestern Naturalist <br /> <br />vol. 35, no. 2 <br /> <br />194 <br /> <br />TABLE 2-Average calculated total lengths at each annulus for channel catfish in the Green and Yampa <br />rivers, 1979 to 1988. n = number of fish in which the respective annulus was present in pectoral spine section <br />(45 age-O catfish collected in 1988 not included). <br /> <br /> Average total length at annulus formation' <br />YC2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 <br />87 53 <br />86 45 128 <br />85 31 110 167 <br />84 63 120 171 220 <br />83 65 109 177 203 <br />82 64 119 169 212 246 225 <br />81 70 115 163 202 236 260 282 <br />80 66 111 156 192 224 252 275 <br />79 74 121 166 201 233 261 282 299 <br />78 67 119 165 201 226 251 272 290 304 <br />77 65 116 170 209 239 263 286 308 321 343 <br />76 61 110 166 215 249 276 301 321 341 361 <br />75 70 109 157 196 240 273 295 315 337 354 <br />74 103 168 193 225 258 285 307 323 336 <br />73 72 115 154 188 223 255 282 299 319 344 <br />72 119 178 229 273 307 335 353 373 392 <br />71 96 135 176 201 252 296 325 353 382 <br />70 138 166 216 250 279 299 329 343 369 <br />66 175 239 254 292 322 371 429 472 <br />X 63 116 165 202 234 260 283 305 322 352 <br />SE 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.4 4.0 <br />n 70 260 303 290 277 264 224 169 131 89 <br /> <br />1 Numbers rounded. <br />2 YC = year class; 66 to 87 represent years 1966 to 1987. <br /> <br />catfish stocks at these locations intermingled sig- <br />nificantly or that factors other than physical hab- <br />itat were limiting growth. Although channel cat- <br />fish may display extensive movement in streams <br />(Hubley, 1963), we believe that growth was re- <br />duced by a limited resource base, short growing <br />seasons, and low water temperatures. <br />Diet-Most of the 755 stomachs inspected con- <br />tained food (76.2%), but 23.8% were empty <br />(Yampa River, 21.75%, n = 75; Green River, <br />25.6%, n = 105). Aquatic invertebrates were <br />present in 31 % of stomachs containing food (n = <br />575); 28% contained vascular plants, including <br />horsetail, Equisetum sp. (Sphenopsida), juniper <br />berries, seeds, twigs, and leaves; 22% contained <br />terrestrial insects; 10% contained algae, detritus, <br />and miscellaneous items; 7% contained fish; and <br />1.5% contained mice (Table 3). These foods are <br />similar to those in other locations (Bailey and <br />Harrison, 1948; Davis, 1959; Carlander, 1969; <br />Moyle, 1976). <br /> <br />Channel catfish utilized different foods de- <br />pending on size (and presumably age), river <br />section, and season. Although there were some <br />differences in type of foods selected by different- <br />sized fish in both the Green and Yampa rivers, <br />many of these differences were not significant <br />when the rivers were combined. The only size- <br />specific difference in diet was between individuals <br />consuming vertebrates and individuals consum- <br />ing other foods (Table 3). Terrestrial insects (e.g., <br />Mormon crickets) and vascular plants (e.g., <br />horsetails) were relatively abundant in the Yam- <br />pa and Green rivers in Dinosaur National Mon- <br />ument in late spring to mid-summer and were <br />heavily utilized by channel catfish (Tyus and <br />Minckley, 1988). However, these items are gen- <br />erally scarce in the lower Green River. An algae, <br />Cladophora sp. (Clorophyta), transported into the <br />Dinosaur National Monument area of the Green <br />River from the clear tailwaters of Flaming Gorge <br />Dam, was a common food item of channel catfish <br />