My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7982
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7982
Author
Tyus, H. M.
Title
Ecology and Management of Colorado Squawfish. 379-402.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
517
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I ,i <br />~ 1 <br /> <br />;i <br />J <br />~ <br />j <br />~. ,. <br />t~ i <br />t"l.i<j <br />~'~ i <br />I j <br />I <br />:j <br />I I <br />I ! <br />. j <br />:c' I <br />.'11 i <br />. i <br /> <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />382 Recovery of Long-lived Species <br /> <br />ward recovery of the species in the Green River <br />sub-basin, where it is most widely distributed <br />and abundant, and its ecology is best known. <br /> <br />Background Information <br /> <br />Management options for Colorado squawfish <br />were difficult to develop because its life cycle <br />was so poorly understood. Remote habitats <br />and difficulty in collecting data in the swift, <br />canyon-bound, hostile Colorado River basin <br />also were factors. As late as 1978, the Colo- <br />rado Squawfish Recovery Plan (USFWS 1978b) <br />stated that spawning migrations had not been <br />reported in ten years. <br />Knowledge of spawning areas, nursery habi- <br />tats, and concentration areas was almost non- <br />existent, and they remained poorly docu- <br />mented until the 1980s (Tyus et al. 1981, <br />1982b, 1987; Wick et al. 1981, 1983, 1985; <br />Haynes et al. 1984; Tyus and McAda 1984; <br />Archer et al. 1985, 1986; Tyus 1985, 1986; <br />Nesler et al. 1988), when new and better tech- <br />nology and sufficient funds enabled acceler- <br />ated research. Relative densities for adults, <br />juveniles, and young have now been mapped, <br />and management strategies have been drafted <br />(Archer et al. 1986; USFWS 1987a). Behavior <br />and responses of the fish to environmental fac- <br />tors have been investigated in hatcheries <br />(Toney 1974; Hamman 1981, 1986, 1989) <br />and laboratories (Berry and Pimentel 1985; <br />Black and Bulkley 1985a, b; Marsh 1985; <br />Pimentel et al. 1985; Karp and Tyus 1990). In <br />addition, efforts were made to accumulate <br />habitat information on endangered Colorado <br />River fishes, including squawfish, for use in <br />stream-flow recommendations (W H. Miller <br />et al. 1982b; Valdez et al. 1987; Tyus and <br />Karp 1989). <br />The Colorado squawfish has a complex life <br />cycle. Coevolving as it did with the depauper- <br />ate ichthyofauna of the Colorado River, this <br />large, predaceous fish is a generalist adapted <br />to large seasonal water fluctuations, low food <br /> <br />bases, and changing riverine subsystems (M. L. <br />Smith 1981; G. R. Smith 1981b; Tyus 1986). <br />Cyprinid fishes invaded the New World from <br />Asia in the Oligocene or early Miocene (Cav- <br />ender 1986), and fossil Ptychocheilus are re- <br />ported from as early as Miocene times (Uyeno <br />and Miller 1965; G. R. Smith 1981a; Minck- <br />ley et al. 1986). We must assume that the fish <br />survived by incorporating life strategies to <br />deal with changing climates varying from plu- <br />vial to arid, using migration and long-distance <br />movement for exploiting changing habitats <br />and environmental conditions of the late <br />Cenozoic, and developing adaptations that <br />enabled it to compete and survive until recent <br />times (G. R. Smith 1981a, b; Tyus 1986). As <br />a result, adult, juvenile, and young Colorado <br />squawfish acquired different life-history attri- <br />butes for survival, and they adapted to utilize <br />virtually every habitat available. <br />The adaptability of Colorado squawfish <br />must form the basis for their management to- <br />ward recovery. However, habitat preferences <br />are difficult to ascertain in nature, and fish dis- <br />tributions and abundances are typically used <br />to infer them. As an example, the USFWS has <br />used densities of different life-history stages <br />in designating "sensitive areas" to guide pro- <br />tective and management measures (Archer et <br />al. 1986; USFWS 1987a). In the following sec- <br />tions particular emphasis is placed on statis- <br />tics for abundance, since the development of <br />appropriate management objectives and the <br />success of any management tool can only be <br />judged on the basis of population response. <br />Detailed descriptions of specific habitat <br />parameters are outside the scope of this pre- <br />sentation, but references are supplied where <br />needed. <br /> <br />Life Cycle <br /> <br />Longevity, age,and sexual maturity <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish are capable of living long <br />lives and attaining large sizes. Adult squawfish <br /> <br /> <br />were the larges <br />rado River, and <br />important attri <br />advantages. Th <br />companied by <br />favor large adl <br />slow growth (tl <br />nine years) ane <br />Colorado SqU3 <br />1.8-m specimer <br />of age. In the I <br />indicated that <br />42.8 cm TL Wt <br />than 50.3 cm v <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />--~ <br /> <br />I <br />L <br /> <br />Duchesne R. <br /> <br />~ <br />UT <br /> <br />Pri <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />""'-- <br />/ <br />San Rafal <br /> <br />Fig. 19-3. Map <br />showing spawn <br />migrations of a <br />confirmed and <br />larvae are com! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.