Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />II..' <br />1 'f~ <br />, <br />I <br />:i, <br />! ,; <br />I! <br /> <br />I I <br />; ! <br />1,..--'.'.. i <br />i <br /> <br />! I <br />; l' <br />j <br /> <br />394 Recovery of Long-lived Species <br /> <br />collectively maximized in field studies con- <br />flicted with the model's prediction. Subse- <br />quent evaluations revealed that aerial photo- <br />graphic mapping was a more appropriate <br />means of evaluating these habitats. <br />Flow recommendations must also consider <br />temperature effects on larvae, because in- <br />creased flows of colder water also lowered av- <br />erage temperatures in the Green River up- <br />stream from Desolation Canyon. We noted a <br />temperature differential of 100C at the junc- <br />tion of the Green and Yampa rivers in 1983, <br />whereas in better recruitment years the differ- <br />ential was usually less than 20C (1979 = oOC, <br />1980 = I.S oC, 1981 = I.SoC; Tyus et a1. <br />1987). Berry (1988) demonstrated that 100- <br />150C cold shock adversely affected larval Col- <br />orado squawfish (fourteen days old, 9.0 :t 0.3 <br />mm TL). No such effects were noted for larger, <br />forty-day-old fish (24.4 :t 0.4 mm TL). Cold <br />temperatures during larval drift could be im- <br />plicated in the partial loss of the 1983 year <br />class. However, temperatures in 1984 (3.00- <br />60C) did not approach this differential and <br />thus do not explain loss of that year class. <br />Also, similar losses occurred in the Green <br />River downstream of the Gray Canyon <br />spawning area, a reach that was not affected <br />by low temperatures from the dam, but was <br />affected by high discharges as in the upper <br />river. Temperatures in the few backwaters ob- <br />served during USFWS autumn sampling in <br />1984 averaged 22.80C; main-channel temper- <br />atures were 19.5oC (Tyus et a!. 1987). Thus, <br />field data supported the concept of a loss of <br />recruitment due to high discharges that <br />flooded ephemeral backwater habitats. Low <br />temperature can have an influence, but it was <br />not the primary factor limiting larval produc- <br />tion in 1983 and 1984. <br /> <br />Yampa River <br /> <br />Habitat use and stream-flow needs of rare and <br />endangered fishes in the Yampa River were <br />presented by Tyus and Karp (1989), who <br /> <br />evaluated requirements of fishes by interpret- <br />ing empirical biological and discharge data, <br />and then recommended flow regimens. Protec- <br />tion of flow and temperature regimens for ini- <br />tiation of spring spawning migrations and <br />flows, temperatures, and sediment transport <br />conditions during spawning were empha- <br />sized. Based on habitat use and behavior, they <br />demonstrated that high spring discharges in <br />concert with increasing water temperatures <br />were predictably associated with initiation of <br />spawning migration. Decreasing discharges in <br />early summer to midsummer were associated <br />with successful spawning and downstream <br />drift of larvae to nursery habitats. Existing <br />winter base flows appeared adequate for main- <br />tenance of winter habitat conditions (Wick <br />and Hawkins 1989). <br />Tyus and Karp (1989) also reviewed out- <br />puts of IFIM/PHABSIM modeling of Colorado <br />squawfish requirements developed in 1984 for <br />staging and spawning (Archer and Tyus 1984; <br />Rose 1984), and in 1987 for spawning, for <br />possible use in developing discharge recom- <br />mendations. Recommended discharges at <br />which 90% simulated spawning habitat was <br />obtained varied between 9.9 and 31.1 m3 S-1 <br />(HO-IIOO ft3 S-1) for staging and 8.5-42.5 <br />m3 S-1 (300-1500 ft3 S-1) for egg deposition, <br />using habitat utilization curves developed in <br />1984. However, curves produced in 1987 pro- <br />duced different results. Adult habitat was op- <br />timized as flows approached zero, and spawn- <br />ing habitat was optimized at 42.S m3 S-1 <br />(IS00 ft3 S-1). Furthermore, some discharges <br />presumably optimizing habitat for other en- <br />dangered species conflicted with those pre- <br />ferred by squawfish. The model outputs were <br />rejected in deference to interpretations of em- <br />pirical results. Many constraints have been <br />placed on the use of IFlM habitat-suitability <br />curves (Valdez et a1. 1987), and our findings <br />indicated that a simple three-variable model <br />(depth, velocity, and substrate) did not accu- <br />rately or adequately describe relations be- <br />