Laserfiche WebLink
<br />plan to conduct basic ecological studies concurrently with developing recovery <br />and management options. This would best serve the needs of the Recovery <br />Implementation Program with respect to efficiency, timeliness, and cost. <br />It is presumed that studies be designed and implemented with the combined <br />efforts of Federal and State agencies, university researchers, and others. <br /> <br />We propose that the authors constitute a steering group for implementing <br />the program. An advisory work group would consist of the following: (1) a <br />representative from each of the non-game divisions of state wildlife <br />conservation agencies from Arizona, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico; (2) one <br />representative from the Bureau of Reclamation; (3) one representative from the <br />Western Area Power Administration; (4) an expert on artificial imprinting <br />(A.T. Scholz); (5) an expert on chemosensory cues from reproductive by- <br />products (N.R. Foster); and (6) a representative from the Biology Committee, <br />Recovery Implementation Program. In addition, administrative and clerical <br />support would be necessary, and this would presumably be available from the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service. <br /> <br />Study initiatives and priorities would be developed jointly by the <br />steering and advisory groups. It would then be incumbent on the steering group <br />to implement annual work agendas by the most prudent and feasible means. <br />Studies would presumably consist of laboratory and field activities, of which <br />laboratory work would be solicited from competent researchers at large. Field <br />studies would be conducted primarily by state and federal agencies. <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish <br /> <br />Work on Colorado squawfish would be primarily field-oriented, and directed <br />toward evaluation and protection of some stocks, and augmentation of others. <br />Recovery of Colorado squawfish may require provision of new spawning habitats <br />in some areas and reestablishment of populations in areas where it is lost, or <br />greatly diminished. Population augmentation or reintroduction may fail unless <br />the reproductive behavior associated with the location of suitable spawning <br />and nursery sites is understood. <br /> <br />Information about reproductive ecology of Colorado squawfish in the Green <br />and Yampa rivers was used to outline studies evaluating olfaction and <br />imprinting as a means for recovering or re-establishing populations of the <br />fish. Further development of such studies would be accomplished jointly with <br />assistance from knowledgeable researchers. A principal investigator has been <br />identified to gUide each major study section, and field personnel suggested <br />for conducting the work. Locations selected for performing the work were <br />based on criteria associated with operational costs and recovery potential. <br /> <br />Razorback sucker <br /> <br />Razorback sucker work would include an evaluation of existing stocks, but <br />more emphasis would be placed on artificial imprinting as a stop-gap measure. <br />Emphasis would be placed on stock evaluation and use of hatchery facilities to <br />a greater extent than in the Colorado squawfish. <br /> <br />The Colorado River Fishes Propagation and Experiment Station at Ouray, Utah <br />has been given a high priority for razorback sucker work because of its <br />proximity to a large population of spawning adults and potential recovery <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />\, <br /> <br />M <br /> <br />i~~ <br />0! <br /> <br />\' ; <br /> <br />~.,. <br />~. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />