Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />,I: <br />, ,- <br /> <br />214 <br /> <br />COPELI\., 1985, NO.1 <br /> <br />(/l <br />a: <br />w <br />~ <br />w <br />~ <br />~ <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />MAY <br /> <br />JUNE <br /> <br />JULY <br /> <br />AUG <br /> <br />SEPT <br /> <br />MONTH <br /> <br />Fig. 2. Migration of 8 radiotagged Colorado <br />squawfish to spawning grounds in the Yampa River, <br />1983. Each dot represents one radio contact. Con- <br />nected dots represent the movement pattern of one <br />fish. Mouth of Yampa River = 0 km. <br /> <br />er Yampa River Canyon during both years. <br />Another migration to a spawning site in Gray <br />Canyon of the Green River was suspected in <br />1981 but not confirmed until fish were moni- <br />tored in 1982 and 1983 (Fig. 3). Colorado <br />squawfish also displayed both upstream and <br />downstream movement (positive and negative <br />rheotaxis) in migrating to the spawning site. A <br />fidelity to the Yampa River spawning site was <br />demonstrated in 1983, when two ripe Colorado <br />squawfish tagged there in 1981, and one tagged <br />there in 1982, returned to the same location <br />for spawning. <br />Potamodromous migrations (Myers, 1949) of <br />North American riverine fishes have received <br />little study in comparison with the information <br />developed for anadromous forms. Until now, <br />homing-a regular movement to a specific site <br />(Gerking, 1959)-has been most dramatically <br />demonstrated in salmonids (Harden-Jones, <br />1981) and most studies of potamodromous <br />species only document short distance move- <br />ments of a few kilometers. The movement pat- <br />terns of Colorado squawfish (Figs. 1-3) dem- <br />onstrate long distance homing and their <br />behavior is similar in many ways to that ob- <br />served in migrating salmonids, including posi- <br />tive and negative rheotaxis in orienting to <br />spawning grounds (Harden-Jones, 1981; Hasler <br /> <br />(/l <br />a: <br />w <br />~ <br />w <br />::I <br />o <br />...J <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~--::-^~ 1981 <br />--:---0::_ 1982 <br />--. '983 <br /> <br />.J--c--- <br /> <br />APR <br /> <br />MAY <br /> <br />JUNE <br /> <br />JULY <br /> <br />AUG <br /> <br />SEPT <br /> <br />MONTH <br /> <br />Fig. 3. Migration of 7 radiotagged Colorado <br />squaw fish to spawning grounds in the Green River, <br />1981-83. Each dot represents one radiocontacl. Con- <br />nected dots represent the movement pattern of one <br />fish. Mouth of Green River = 0 km. <br /> <br />and Scholz, 1983) and "overshooting and back- <br />tracking" (Hasler and Scholz, 1983). <br />Olfaction appears to be commonly used by <br />fish species for navigational purposes and is more <br />widespread than formerly believed (Leggett <br />1977). The initiation of spawning appears to <br />hasten the arrival of other Colorado squawfish <br />to the spawning area, and collections of ripe <br />Colorado squawfish coincide very well with the <br />location of radio-telemetered squaw fish even <br />though the fish move freely within an area 01 <br />several miles. These observations are in agree. <br />ment with those by Hasler and Scholz (1983: <br />that conspecific odors act as generalized attrac. <br />tants and they found that salmon respondec <br />more strongly to odors of other salmon at th( <br />end of spawning season than they did to im- <br />printing odors. Although there is no experi <br />mental evidence to date that confirms or dis. <br /> <br />