<br />
<br />, ftU1\l~ I C &hJe rSDf\ f rvlccrl1 ne':c
<br />, /q q.3 l
<br />
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />f.t~~mjllI~m~..j
<br />I
<br />
<br />
<br />i
<br />'--
<br />
<br />THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 38(4):362-369
<br />
<br />DECEMBER 1993
<br />
<br />'lIb,>
<br />C{rgS Dece
<br />
<br />
<br />veys
<br />catel
<br />pers
<br />dow
<br />in I'
<br />stoc\
<br />mgs
<br />Our
<br />squc
<br />to a-,
<br />the J
<br />pote
<br />squc
<br />
<br />EV ALVA TION OF AN INTRODUCTION OF COLORADO
<br />SQUAWFISH IN A MAIN STEM IMPOUNDMENT
<br />ON THE WHITE RIVER, COLORADO
<br />
<br />MELISSA A. TRAMMELL, ERIC P. BERGERSEN, AND
<br />PATRICK J. MARTINEZ
<br />
<br />Colorado Cooperative Fish 0- Wildlife Research Unit, 201 Wagar Building, Colorado State University,
<br />Fort Collins, CO 80523 (MAT, EPB)
<br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, Wildlife Research Center, 317 West Prospect,
<br />Fort Collins, CO 80526 (PfM)
<br />Present address of MAT: Utah Wildlife Resources, Moab Native Fishes Field Office,
<br />P.O. Box 388, Moab, UT 84532
<br />
<br />temperature regimes (Tyus, 1991). The White
<br />River, previously free-flowing, was impounded
<br />by Taylor Draw Dam in 1985, 16 river-kilo-
<br />meters east of Rangely, Colorado, creating Ken-
<br />ney Reservoir. The dam effectively reduced the
<br />suitable habitat available to squaw fish in the
<br />White River by 80 km by preventing access to
<br />areas upstream from the dam. According to un-
<br />published findings of the Colorado Division of
<br />Wildlife, this represents about 16"lo of the doc-
<br />umented range in Colorado.
<br />There are no records of Colorado squaw fish
<br />reproducing in the White River and no suitable
<br />spawning conditions have been identified (Carl-
<br />son et aI., 1979; Haynes et aI., 1984). In light of
<br />this and because of construction mitigation agree-
<br />ments, Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW)
<br />and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
<br />began a Colorado squaw fish stocking program in
<br />1988, calling for 50,000 fingerling-age I Colorado
<br />squawfish to be stocked in each ofthe three years,
<br />1988-1990. After the first stocking in 1988, sur-
<br />
<br />M
<br />comr
<br />Rese
<br />to th
<br />1988
<br />upstr
<br />becal
<br />strea
<br />the (
<br />subd:
<br />Kl
<br />RK
<br />axis.
<br />its w
<br />the (
<br />held
<br />Whi,
<br />deter
<br />reser
<br />an 0\
<br />flow
<br />to all
<br />D,
<br />Cent
<br />Colo
<br />Fish
<br />the ~
<br />150,(
<br />was
<br />96,5'
<br />ervoi
<br />alon!
<br />batd
<br />Kl
<br />--ting,
<br />was
<br />were
<br />Catc
<br />the t<
<br />effor
<br />
<br />ABSTRACT-We evaluated endangered Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) as a potential
<br />sportfish in Kenney Reservoir from 1988 to 1990 as part of a mitigation program for the construction
<br />of Taylor Draw Dam which impounded Kenney Reservoir on the White River, Colorado. A total of
<br />96,597 fingerling squaw fish were stocked into Kenney Reservoir from 1988 to 1990. These fish quickly
<br />dispersed throughout the reservoir, and downstream into the White River. A small number moved
<br />upstream in 1990. A large proportion, associated with high discharge following stocking, exited over
<br />the spillway, and continued to move downstream. Catch-per-unit-effort declined drastically in both
<br />the river and the reservoir in 1989 and 1990. The rapid disappearance of squawfish throughout the
<br />study area was attributed to flow regime, movement patterns, mortality, sampling ineffectiveness or
<br />a combination of these. Telemetry observations of six adult Colorado squawfish revealed no difference
<br />in behavior attributable to wild or hatchery origin. Stocking squaw fish in Kenney Reservoir did not
<br />appear to be an effective mitigation procedure for habitat loss due to impoundment.
<br />
<br />The Colorado squaw fish PtychocheiLus Lucius is
<br />endemic to the Colorado River Basin. Once abun-
<br />dant, its decline has necessitated full protection
<br />as an endangered species (Federal Register, VoL
<br />39[3]:1175, 1974). The historical range of this
<br />large cyprinid extended from Northern Sonora,
<br />Mexico to Green River, Wyoming, including
<br />much of the mainstem Colorado River and most
<br />of its larger tributaries (Colorado River Fishes
<br />Recovery Team, 1988). It is now restricted to a
<br />fraction of its former range, including the main
<br />stem Colorado River from Lake Powell to Pali-
<br />sade; the Green River below Brown's Park; the
<br />Yampa River below Craig; the White River be-
<br />low Rio Blanco Reservoir; and in portions of the
<br />San Juan River in Colorado, Utah and New
<br />Mexico (Colorado River Fishes Recovery Team,
<br />1988; Tyus, 1991).
<br />Main stem impoundments on the Colorado
<br />River system have largely contributed to the de-
<br />cline of Colorado squawfish .populations by
<br />blocking migration routes and altering flow and
<br />
<br />waSt
<br />gill I
<br />wide
<br />
<br />
|