Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, ftU1\l~ I C &hJe rSDf\ f rvlccrl1 ne':c <br />, /q q.3 l <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />f.t~~mjllI~m~..j <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />'-- <br /> <br />THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 38(4):362-369 <br /> <br />DECEMBER 1993 <br /> <br />'lIb,> <br />C{rgS Dece <br /> <br /> <br />veys <br />catel <br />pers <br />dow <br />in I' <br />stoc\ <br />mgs <br />Our <br />squc <br />to a-, <br />the J <br />pote <br />squc <br /> <br />EV ALVA TION OF AN INTRODUCTION OF COLORADO <br />SQUAWFISH IN A MAIN STEM IMPOUNDMENT <br />ON THE WHITE RIVER, COLORADO <br /> <br />MELISSA A. TRAMMELL, ERIC P. BERGERSEN, AND <br />PATRICK J. MARTINEZ <br /> <br />Colorado Cooperative Fish 0- Wildlife Research Unit, 201 Wagar Building, Colorado State University, <br />Fort Collins, CO 80523 (MAT, EPB) <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, Wildlife Research Center, 317 West Prospect, <br />Fort Collins, CO 80526 (PfM) <br />Present address of MAT: Utah Wildlife Resources, Moab Native Fishes Field Office, <br />P.O. Box 388, Moab, UT 84532 <br /> <br />temperature regimes (Tyus, 1991). The White <br />River, previously free-flowing, was impounded <br />by Taylor Draw Dam in 1985, 16 river-kilo- <br />meters east of Rangely, Colorado, creating Ken- <br />ney Reservoir. The dam effectively reduced the <br />suitable habitat available to squaw fish in the <br />White River by 80 km by preventing access to <br />areas upstream from the dam. According to un- <br />published findings of the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife, this represents about 16"lo of the doc- <br />umented range in Colorado. <br />There are no records of Colorado squaw fish <br />reproducing in the White River and no suitable <br />spawning conditions have been identified (Carl- <br />son et aI., 1979; Haynes et aI., 1984). In light of <br />this and because of construction mitigation agree- <br />ments, Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) <br />and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service <br />began a Colorado squaw fish stocking program in <br />1988, calling for 50,000 fingerling-age I Colorado <br />squawfish to be stocked in each ofthe three years, <br />1988-1990. After the first stocking in 1988, sur- <br /> <br />M <br />comr <br />Rese <br />to th <br />1988 <br />upstr <br />becal <br />strea <br />the ( <br />subd: <br />Kl <br />RK <br />axis. <br />its w <br />the ( <br />held <br />Whi, <br />deter <br />reser <br />an 0\ <br />flow <br />to all <br />D, <br />Cent <br />Colo <br />Fish <br />the ~ <br />150,( <br />was <br />96,5' <br />ervoi <br />alon! <br />batd <br />Kl <br />--ting, <br />was <br />were <br />Catc <br />the t< <br />effor <br /> <br />ABSTRACT-We evaluated endangered Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) as a potential <br />sportfish in Kenney Reservoir from 1988 to 1990 as part of a mitigation program for the construction <br />of Taylor Draw Dam which impounded Kenney Reservoir on the White River, Colorado. A total of <br />96,597 fingerling squaw fish were stocked into Kenney Reservoir from 1988 to 1990. These fish quickly <br />dispersed throughout the reservoir, and downstream into the White River. A small number moved <br />upstream in 1990. A large proportion, associated with high discharge following stocking, exited over <br />the spillway, and continued to move downstream. Catch-per-unit-effort declined drastically in both <br />the river and the reservoir in 1989 and 1990. The rapid disappearance of squawfish throughout the <br />study area was attributed to flow regime, movement patterns, mortality, sampling ineffectiveness or <br />a combination of these. Telemetry observations of six adult Colorado squawfish revealed no difference <br />in behavior attributable to wild or hatchery origin. Stocking squaw fish in Kenney Reservoir did not <br />appear to be an effective mitigation procedure for habitat loss due to impoundment. <br /> <br />The Colorado squaw fish PtychocheiLus Lucius is <br />endemic to the Colorado River Basin. Once abun- <br />dant, its decline has necessitated full protection <br />as an endangered species (Federal Register, VoL <br />39[3]:1175, 1974). The historical range of this <br />large cyprinid extended from Northern Sonora, <br />Mexico to Green River, Wyoming, including <br />much of the mainstem Colorado River and most <br />of its larger tributaries (Colorado River Fishes <br />Recovery Team, 1988). It is now restricted to a <br />fraction of its former range, including the main <br />stem Colorado River from Lake Powell to Pali- <br />sade; the Green River below Brown's Park; the <br />Yampa River below Craig; the White River be- <br />low Rio Blanco Reservoir; and in portions of the <br />San Juan River in Colorado, Utah and New <br />Mexico (Colorado River Fishes Recovery Team, <br />1988; Tyus, 1991). <br />Main stem impoundments on the Colorado <br />River system have largely contributed to the de- <br />cline of Colorado squawfish .populations by <br />blocking migration routes and altering flow and <br /> <br />waSt <br />gill I <br />wide <br /> <br />