Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. l1Qo JcJda)\vldmt .~ . <br /> <br /> <br />u.s. Forest Serviae, Rocky @ 1990 by S.E.L & Associates <br /> <br />~lletin RM-ll). <br />Ls with unet}ual populations. <br /> <br />~)l~ <br /> <br />Ital principles for water and <br />DC: U.S. Government Print- <br /> <br />Habitat Suitability Index Curves for <br />Humpback Chub of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />I application of a systematic <br /> <br />se of travel cost models with <br />400-407. <br />n empirical application of a <br />Fort Collins: Colorado State <br />101). <br />r economics: Recreation use and <br />lliance. <br />in a fully appropriated river <br />trees Research 23(3):381-392. <br /> <br />Received April 1, 1989 <br />Accepted May 15, 1989 <br />cussion open until August 1, 1990 <br /> <br />Richard A. Valdez <br />Paul B. Holden <br />Thomas B. Hardy* <br />RIO/WEST, Inc. <br />1063 West 1400 North <br />Logan, Utah 84321 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT: Habitat suitability index (SI) curves were developed for the <br />endangered humpback chub (Gila cypha) using previously-collected mi- <br />crohabitat data from the Upper Colorado River Basin. Data selection, par- <br />titioning and pooling, as well as curve development were decided by <br />consensus by a panel of species experts during two week-long workshops. <br />The result was a total of 14 riverine SI curves associating four life stages <br />(larvae, young-of-the-year, juvenile, and adult) with three microhabitat <br />parameters (water depth, velocity, and substrate). The SI curves were <br />developed to best fit actual field data, and modified by the experts ac- <br />cording to biological judgment. The species experts classified these as <br />"interim SI curves" and recommended application of only the adult curve <br />set, recognizing that much information still needs to be gathered on the <br />rare fishes of the upper basin. The process by which these SI curves were <br />developed is recommended in dealing with large volumes of pre-existing <br />microhabitat information scattered through many literature sources and <br />reports. The concept of assimilating the data for evaluation by a panel of <br />species experts was sound in that it allowed for a joint review by the <br />experts without each investing large amounts of time to independently <br />research the data. The idea of open workshops, in which experts and <br />participants were given equal opportunity to express opinions, also worked <br />well, although a third workshop was recommended to allow the experts <br />to participate in generation of weighted usable area and evaluation of the <br />streamflow to habitat relationships. <br /> <br />KEY WORDS: Humpback chub, Gila cypha, habitat suitability index <br />curves, Upper Colorado River Basin, microhabitat, Physical Habitat Sim- <br />ulation, Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, Delphi technique, en- <br />dangered species. <br /> <br />* Present address: Department of Civil and En- <br />v.ironmental Engineering, Utah State Univer- <br />Sity, Logan, Utah 84322-4110. <br /> <br />T INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />he Instream Flow Incremental Meth- 1978; Trihey 1979; Glova 1982). The pm <br />odology (IFIM) is one of many meth- includes the development of stream <br />ods available to quantify the habitat of riv- draulic models, stream temperature moe <br />erine fishes as a function of flow (Stalnaker simulation models of physical stream 1 <br />itat (Milhous 1979; Milhous et al. 19 <br />and biological models or criteria for <br />microhabitat preference known as hat <br />suitability index (51) curves (Bovee 1 ( <br /> <br />~er 1 <br /> <br />January 1990 \ <br /> <br />Rivers. Volume 1, Number 1 <br /> <br />Pages 31-42 <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />