Laserfiche WebLink
°""'~f - - (Notropis lutrensis), fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)1. <br />and sand shiner (N. stramineus) accounted for 75.6% of the <br />fish composition. Flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus la[ipinnis) <br />and roundtail chub (G. robusta) were the most common native <br />species. Small numbers of adult and juvenile Colorado <br />,x.,~,,, -~_- squawfish occurred as well as small numbers of adult razor- <br />back sucker. <br />~" r:• ; <br />- a; - ,~ <br />t,,.~~„-..,-. <br />-~''~-=? <br />_ -~_ _"~- ~~-..K-~ <br />__ <br />-. <br />~~ ~ Backwaters in the Upper Colorado River are very produc- <br />~~ ~' ,~ five commu nities and support a varied complement of fishes, <br />:tom`-~., _ dominated by non-natives. The rare Colorado squawfish and <br />~ <br />- ~~'='~_= razorback sucker frequently use these backwaters during <br />_ <br />r'~ `~~ _ runoff for staging, resting and feeding; and in low water for <br />;,~~ feeding. <br />Figure 1. Typical backwater of the Upper Colorado River form- <br />ed by an inundated side channel, river mile 158. <br />Table II. Percentage composition of native and non-native <br />fishes in five randomly-selected backwaters of the <br />Upper Colorado River (n=1895). <br />Native Species Percentage Non-Native Percentage <br /> Species Composition <br />flannelmouth sucker 10.6 red shiner 30.3 <br />roundtail chub 5.5 fathead minnow 27.4 <br />Colorado squawfish 0.9 sand shiner 17.9 <br />bluehead sucker 0.2 black bullhead 2.6 <br />razorback sucker 0.2 largemouth bass 1.9 <br />total: 17.4 green sunfish 1.2 <br /> common carp 0.6 <br /> channel catfish 0.3 <br /> black crappie 0.2 <br /> white sucker 0.2 <br /> total: 82.6 <br />Embayments <br />Embayments are generally smaller than backwaters and <br />often form a[ upstream and downstream ends of sand bars <br />between the bar and the more stable river bank (Figure 2). <br />Embayments are also found on the periphery of sand islands <br />between sand spits. These habitats are usually inundated <br />and formed by eddies during high flows. Eddy currents dig <br />deep concavities in the channel bed. As flow subsides, fine <br />sediments are deposited in the low-velocity areas to form <br />bars with depressions for embayments in the high-velocity <br />areas. Few embayments exist on the river longer than one <br />normal water year because of the shifting river substrate. <br />Five randomly-selected embayments from. the Upper Colo- <br />rado River had an average surface area of 0.13 ha and an <br />average depth of 0.2 m (Table III). No detectable velocity <br />was recorded, but like backwaters, wind circulation and river <br />exchange does occur. The substrate of embayments is usually <br />silt or sand. <br />A large complement of non-native fishes (96.0% numerical <br />composition) was represented in embayments (Table IV ). 'Red <br />shiner, sand shiner and fathead minnow made up 91.5% of the <br />fish composition. Native fishes composed only 4.0% of the <br />catch; young bluehead sucker (C. discobolus) and yoy and <br />juvenile Colorado squawfish were the most common species. <br />Embayments in the Upper Colorado River tend to support a <br />greater percentage of non-native fishes than do backwaters, <br />probably because the smaller, shallower and warmer embayments <br />are more conducive to the small non-natives and their young. <br />Embayments also appear to be the principal nurseries for yoy <br />Colorado squawfish and some humpback chub; these fishes <br />appear subjected Co a potentially competitive situation. <br />522 I 523 <br />