Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br />Dorsal - Anal Fin Ray Counts <br /> <br />A key char~cter often used to distinguish ~ cypha from ~ robusta is <br />the presence of 9 dorsal and 10 anal fin rays in the former and 9 dorsal and <br />9 anal fin rays in the later (Holden and Stalnaker 1970, Minkley 1973). These <br />studies and others (Suttkus and Clemmer 1977) since have revealed great varia- <br />tion in this character among fish distinctly ~ cypha. Preliminary results of <br />the CRFP data confirm this variation in fin rays. Variation among individuals <br />from the same area and between individuals from separated areas indicate that <br />dorsal and anal fin ray counts do not appear to be a reliable single meristic <br />character for separation between ~ ~ and ~ robusta. <br /> <br />Nuchal Depth <br /> <br />Nuchal depth development has been suggested as an effective means of <br />distinguishing adults of the three Colorado River chubs (Smith, Miller, and <br />Sable 1979). The methodology provides a direct repeatable measurement, <br />accurate to 0.1 rom, of the development of the nuchal hump in association <br />with the depressed (often concave) dorsal surface of the skull. <br /> <br />A ratio is employed that is derived by measuring the depth of the frontal <br />depression (maximum distance between a straight line from highest part of <br />nuchal hump and dorsal tip of snout, and dorsal surface of skull) and <br />dividing this figure into the distance between the insertion of the pectoral <br />and pelvic fins. <br /> <br />This method is being used by CRFP on individuals distinctly ~ cypha <br />or ~ robusta as well as the apparent variants or integrades. There is <br />general agreement between the nuchal hump ratios presented by Smith, Miller <br />and Sable (1979) and those preliminarily computed for individuals from three <br />of the four populations of the Upper Colorado River (Black Rocks, Westwater, <br />and Cataract). Measurements on individuals from the Debeque population <br />generally lie outside of the nuchal hump ratios established for ~ cypha. <br /> <br />Taxonomic Analyses <br /> <br />Taxonomic and systematic studies are being conducted on young, juveniles, <br />and adults of G. cypha, robusta, and elegans. Analyses of young and juveniles <br />are being conducted by Dr. Daryll Snyder at the LarVal Fishes Laboratory in <br />Fort Collins, Colorado. A guide to the larval fishes of the Colorado River <br />will be the p~oduct of this work. Adults are being examined by Drs. Royal <br />Suttkus and Glenn Clemmer in affiliation with the Denver Wildlife Research <br />Center of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Drs. Suttkusand Clemmer are <br />examining specimens from past and present collections to establish the breadth <br />of variability exhibited by each of the three Gila forms. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />The humpback chub of the Upper Colorado River is distributed in four <br />areas (1) Debeque Canyon, Colorado (verification of identity pending) (2) <br />Black Rocks, Colorado (3) t~estwater Canyon, Utah and (4) Cataract Canyon, Utah. <br />Ongoing studies by the Colorado River Fisheries Project indicate that deep, swift, <br />rock canyons are critical to the survival of the species. <br />