Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... <br /> <br />l~H <br /> <br />THANS, AMElL FISH, SOc., 1%9, NO.2 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />FIGi:IlE I.-Green River study area, showing lo_ <br />cation of sampling stations, GR = Greendak <br /><USGS); LH = Little Hole; BP = Bridgeport; LO <br />= Lodore; EP = Echo Park; IP = Island Park' <br />SM = Split Mountain; JE = Jensen (USGS); OU <br />= Ouray, <br /> <br />have been inundated, and operation of Flam- <br />ing Gorge Reservoir has resulted in maj or <br />changes in flow and temperature patterns <br />in the river below the dam,4 <br />The present investigation was part of a <br />follow-up study to determine the effects of <br />the fish control program upon fish popula- <br />tions in Dinosaur National Monument 46 <br />miles downstream from Flaming Gorcre Dam <br />~ 0 , <br />and to assess changes on habitat and popula- <br />tions in the Monument brought about by the <br />closure of Flaming Gorge Dam. <br /> <br />METHODS AND MATERIALS <br /> <br />The study area was limited to the Green <br />Hiver primarily in Dinosaur National Monu- <br />ment, but collecting sites were also located <br /> <br />4 Vanieek, C David, Rohert II Kramer, and the <br />late Donald Il. Fr:lllklin (MS), Di,rrihuliou of Grecn <br />Hi,'er fishes following closure of Flaming Gorge <br />Dam, <br /> <br />above and below the Monument Location of <br />sampling sites was dictated largely by ve- <br />hicle and boat access to the river. Intensive <br />sampling stations were established at Lodore, <br />Echo Park, Island Park, and Split Mountain, <br />all within Dinosaur National Monument, and <br />supplemental statior.3 were located at Liule <br />Hole, Bridgeport, and Ouray (Figure 1), <br />Fish populations were sampled with nylon <br />experimental gill nets 75. and 150-ft long <br />with mesh sizes ranging from 3/4.inch to <br />3-inch stretch measure; a 30-ft, 1/4-inch <br />mesh, nylon straight seine; a 15-ft, lI8-inch <br />hobbinet straight seine; an electric shocker <br />powered by a 230-volt generator and mounted <br />on an 18-ft aluminum flat-bottomed boat <br />fitted with stainless steel electrodes; tow nets; <br />food strainers; and a modified scoop shovel <br />with window.screen inserts. <br />Fish specimens were preserved in 10-per- <br />cent formalin in the field and later trans. <br />ferred to 40-percent isopropyl alcohol in the <br />laboratory. Total length (from the tip of the <br />snout to the tip of the caudal fin when com- <br />pressed) of all fish was measured to the <br />nearest millimeter, and weight was recorded <br />in grams_ Approximately 10 scales were taken <br />from the right side of each fish just above the <br />lateral line for age and growth determina- <br />tions. Stomachs were taken from fish of all <br />size groups, and contents were analyzed with <br />the aid of a binocular microscope. <br />Continuous recordings of water tempera- <br />tures were made with Ryan Model D porta hIe <br />recording thermometers, Daily temperature <br />readings were made at all stations with a <br />pocket thermometer when fish samples were <br />taken, Water temperature records were also <br />obtained from U.S, Geological Survey records <br />for gaging stations at Greendale and Jensen, <br />Water quality analyses were made at least <br />once each visit to a sampling station. <br />Two morphological variants of the Colo- <br />rado chub were present in the area and are <br />referred to in this study as the "round tail" <br />Illld the "honytail." These two forms were <br />classified as subspecies Gila robusta robusta <br />and G. r. elegans, respectively, by Miller <br />( 1946), The taxollumy of these fishes is <br />poorly ulldt~rstood alld criteria are not avail- <br />able for distillguishing between young fish of <br />