Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ .. J YUSp ~_. bVvft\'iCK> /vtcj~'ci~ <br />~o7 g / jY~4 <br /> <br />'~: ':"-~~~'~^:_:~~:~:':')"~'~~~:'_~; <..:r.: <~!d <br /> <br />North American Journal oj Fisheries Management 4: 177-180, 1984 <br /> <br />o I .50'b <br />. ~ <br /> <br />Use of Radiotelemetry for Obtaining Habitat <br />Preference Data on Colorado Squawfish <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />HAROLD M. Tyus, BOB D. BURDICK, AND C. W. McADA <br /> <br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />447 East Main Street <br />Vernal, Utah 84078 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Habitat preferences of Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus Lucius were obtained from 2,329 ob- <br />servations of 22 radiotelemetered fish and compared with habitat information obtained at the point <br />of capture for 241 fish. Depth, velocity, and substrate preferences also were compared by these two <br />methods. Radiotelemetry observations appear to avoid some of the bias from conventional collec- <br />tions, and can provide a better understanding of habitat requirements for stream fishes. <br /> <br />Stream fishes are difficult to study (Hynes 1970) <br />and behavioral information in turbid rivers must <br />be obtained by capturing fish in situ because vi- <br />sual observations are impossible. Habitat pref- <br />erence data for endemic Colorado River fishes <br />(Tyus et al. 1982) have been obtained by re- <br />cording habitat information at the point of cap- <br />ture of individual fish. These data are biased by <br />differences in collection techniques and the type <br />of gear employed. Radiotelemetry has been used <br />primarily to obtain information about general <br />fish movement but is seldom used for micro- <br />habitat studies. However, fish radiotelemetry of- <br />fers great promise for such studies (Stasko and <br />Pincock 1977) and the use of internal vs. external <br />transmitters (Chamberlain 1979) avoids the ab- <br />normal behavior observed in some telemetered <br />fishes (Ross and McCormick 1981). In this pa- <br />per, we discuss habitat preferences for Colorado <br />squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) using data ob- <br />tained by radiotelemetry and that obtained from <br />conventional fish collections as two methods for <br />obtaining habitat preference information. We <br />hope that fish managers will explore the use of <br />radiotelemetry as a method for learning more <br />about the behavior and habitat preferences of <br />stream fishes, especially in turbid streams where <br />visual observation is precluded. <br /> <br />] <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />ItadioteleD1etry <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish were collected by electro- <br />fishing in April and May. Although fish were <br />more difficult to collect in cold water, better post- <br />operative recovery was anticipated. The fish were <br />obtained from the Green River in 1980 and the <br /> <br />Green, White, and Yampa rivers in 1981 (Fig. <br />1). <br />After their capture, the fish were anesthetized <br />with a 200 mg/liter solution oftricaine methane- <br />sulfonate. Surgery was conducted immediately <br />thereafter using a procedure similar to Bidgood <br />(1980). The incision was made on the lateral side <br />of the fish, immediately anterior and slightly dor- <br />sal to the insertion ofthe right pelvic fin. Surgical <br />implantation of Sm-l (A VM Company) fish <br />modules was made by inserting the beeswax- <br />dipped module into the peritoneum. The inci- <br />sion was closed with individual sutures (usually <br />five), and the fish were held in river holding pens <br />3-5 days before release at point of capture. No <br />ill effects from the surgery were noted. <br />The Sm-l radiotransmitter modules weighed <br />only II g and were powered with a mercury bat- <br />tery having a theoretical life of about 200 days. <br />Smith-Root Model RF-40 and SR-40 radio re- <br />ceivers were used to monitor the 40.660-40.700 <br />Khz transmissions. Fish location was fixed with <br />a small bi-directional loop antenna after their <br />location was approximated with a more sensitive <br />omnidirectional whip antenna. The accuracy of <br />the locating method (triangulation) was un- <br />known, but repeated triangulations indicated the <br />method was precise. Antennas were used from <br />boats and shore to obtain fish position. <br />Habitat preference information was obtained <br />from monitoring the location of Colorado <br />squawfish in the field and measuring habitat pa- <br />rameters at located sites. The initial contact site <br />was recorded and diel studies. were made using <br />the following sampling design: Fish were selected <br />by tag number using a table of random digits. <br />The day was divided into three 8-hour periods <br /> <br />177 <br />