<br />428
<br />
<br />The Southwestern Naturalist
<br />
<br />vol. 35, no. 4
<br />
<br />1989. Sampling in the Green River was conducted
<br />every second or third day depending on success of pre-
<br />vious sampling effort, and once a week in the lower
<br />Yampa River in 1988 and 1989. Captures of razorback
<br />suckers in other spring electrofishing and trammel net-
<br />ting programs in the lower 72 km of the Yampa River
<br />(1987 to 1989) were also included. Sampling was ini-
<br />tiated in mid-to-late April (dependent upon river ice-
<br />melt, weather conditions, and river access) and ter-
<br />minated in June following several attempts with no
<br />razorback sucker captures. This period was sampled
<br />because of captures of ripe razorback suckers in pre-
<br />vious years (Tyus, 1987; C. McAda, pers. comm.). Sex
<br />and spawning condition were determined by expression
<br />of sex products (milt or eggs) either spontaneously or
<br />following manual pressure on the abdomen. Sex was
<br />undetermined for fish with breeding tubercles but with-
<br />out expressible sex products, and these fish were not
<br />considered to be actively spawning (i.e., releasing eggs
<br />or sperm). The estimated breeding period was defined
<br />by the interval between first and last capture of ripe
<br />fish. New captures were tagged with a uniquely num-
<br />bered Carlin-dangler tag, and most fish were weighed
<br />and measured (total length, TL).
<br />Movements and habitat use were investigated from
<br />1987 to 1989 using capture-recapture data and radiote-
<br />lemetry. Fish used in the capture-recapture analyses
<br />included razorback suckers tagged and recaptured by
<br />United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),
<br />individuals tagged by USFWS and recaptured by an-
<br />other agency, and fish tagged by another agency and
<br />recaptured by personnel of USFWS. Seventeen razor-
<br />back suckers were implanted with radio transmitters
<br />by R. Valdez and W. Masslich (pers. comm.) in Oc-
<br />tober and November 1986 and 1987 and tracked by
<br />them during winter. These same fish were tracked by
<br />USFWS during late spring and summer. We present
<br />USFWS radiotracking data, but locations and dates of
<br />initial captures and radio-implantations by R. Valdez
<br />and W. Masslich (pers. comm.) were used as reference
<br />for our evaluation of spring movements.
<br />Habitat descriptors (water temperature, depth, ve-
<br />locity, substrate, and general habitat type such as riffle,
<br />eddy, shoreline, and flowing or quiet water) were re-
<br />corded at the point of fish capture. Water temperature
<br />was recorded with hand-held thermometers, velocity
<br />was measured at 60% of water depth, depth was mea-
<br />sured with a wading rod, and substrate was classified
<br />by visual and manual observation. Substrate in the
<br />spawning reaches was further described from visual
<br />observations taken during periods of low flow. Four
<br />thermographs were used to obtain continuous records
<br />of river temperatures; two were placed in the lower
<br />Yampa River near its confluence with the Green River,
<br />and two were placed in the Green River near Jensen,
<br />Utah.
<br />Radio-implanted fish (Tyus, 1988) were individu-
<br />ally identified by a unique signal (frequency and pulse
<br />rate) using radio receivers, omni-directional whip and
<br />
<br />bi-directional loop antennas. Attempts were made to
<br />locate the radiotagged fish each week from mid-April
<br />to early August 1987 and 1988, using airplanes and
<br />boats. Location (km) and microhabitat data (depth,
<br />velocity, substrate) were taken at the triangulated sig-
<br />nal source if the fish remained in one position for 30
<br />min. After the 30-min period, each fish was disturbed
<br />by wading or probing with a rod to confirm its location,
<br />ensure that it was alive, and to collect substrate data.
<br />Fish movements and recaptures occurring within a
<br />spawning reach or remaining near the initial contact
<br />were classed as "local," and movements between rivers
<br />or spawning reaches were classed as "migrations." Fish
<br />movements to and from a spawning reach in the spring
<br />were considered spawning migrations. Numbers, cap-
<br />ture dates, and locations of native ripe flannelmouth
<br />suckers (Catostomus latipinnis), bluehead suckers (Ca-
<br />tostomus discobolus), and putative razorback x flan-
<br />nelmouth sucker hybrids were recorded in 1989.
<br />
<br />RESUL Ts-A total of 230 adult razorback suck-
<br />ers were captured from 1987 to 1989. Of these,
<br />125 fish received new Carlin-dangler tags, and
<br />70 fish were recaptured on 105 occasions (24 fish
<br />were recaptured more than once). Most razor-
<br />back suckers (84%, n = 194) were ripe and in-
<br />cluded 74% males (n = 144,69 recaptures) and
<br />26% females (n = 50, 18 recaptures). An addi-
<br />tional six fish (two recaptures) were tuberculate
<br />but did not have expressible sex products. Total
<br />lengths of all razorback suckers ranged from 405
<br />to 597 mm. Males averaged 507 mm TL (n =
<br />140, SD = 23.76) and 1,370 g (n = 136, SD =
<br />200.9); females averaged 547 mm TL (n = 45,
<br />SD = 20.56) and 1,686 g (n = 43, SD = 296.98).
<br />Spawning Habits-Ripe male razorback suck-
<br />ers were tuberculate on the anal and caudal fins
<br />and along the sides of the caudal peduncle. Some
<br />ripe females were lightly tuberculate in these same
<br />areas, but most were not. Recaptures within a
<br />season indicated that the appearance of breeding
<br />tubercles in males was closely followed by a readi-
<br />ness to spawn and that tubercles began to fade
<br />soon after the fish were spent (four ripe, heavily
<br />tuberculate males were recaptured 11 to 35 days
<br />later at which time they were not ripe and only
<br />lightly tuberculate).
<br />Razorback suckers were most readily captured
<br />in two areas between mid-April and early June:
<br />the Jensen site (km 486.4 to 504.0) and the Yam-
<br />pa site (lower 5 km of the Yampa River, Fig. 1).
<br />A total of 177 razorback suckers (91% of all
<br />breeding captures) was captured at the Jensen
<br />site and 14 fish (7% of all breeding captures) were
<br />captured at the Yampa site.
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />"
<br />
|