Laserfiche WebLink
<br />428 <br /> <br />The Southwestern Naturalist <br /> <br />vol. 35, no. 4 <br /> <br />1989. Sampling in the Green River was conducted <br />every second or third day depending on success of pre- <br />vious sampling effort, and once a week in the lower <br />Yampa River in 1988 and 1989. Captures of razorback <br />suckers in other spring electrofishing and trammel net- <br />ting programs in the lower 72 km of the Yampa River <br />(1987 to 1989) were also included. Sampling was ini- <br />tiated in mid-to-late April (dependent upon river ice- <br />melt, weather conditions, and river access) and ter- <br />minated in June following several attempts with no <br />razorback sucker captures. This period was sampled <br />because of captures of ripe razorback suckers in pre- <br />vious years (Tyus, 1987; C. McAda, pers. comm.). Sex <br />and spawning condition were determined by expression <br />of sex products (milt or eggs) either spontaneously or <br />following manual pressure on the abdomen. Sex was <br />undetermined for fish with breeding tubercles but with- <br />out expressible sex products, and these fish were not <br />considered to be actively spawning (i.e., releasing eggs <br />or sperm). The estimated breeding period was defined <br />by the interval between first and last capture of ripe <br />fish. New captures were tagged with a uniquely num- <br />bered Carlin-dangler tag, and most fish were weighed <br />and measured (total length, TL). <br />Movements and habitat use were investigated from <br />1987 to 1989 using capture-recapture data and radiote- <br />lemetry. Fish used in the capture-recapture analyses <br />included razorback suckers tagged and recaptured by <br />United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), <br />individuals tagged by USFWS and recaptured by an- <br />other agency, and fish tagged by another agency and <br />recaptured by personnel of USFWS. Seventeen razor- <br />back suckers were implanted with radio transmitters <br />by R. Valdez and W. Masslich (pers. comm.) in Oc- <br />tober and November 1986 and 1987 and tracked by <br />them during winter. These same fish were tracked by <br />USFWS during late spring and summer. We present <br />USFWS radiotracking data, but locations and dates of <br />initial captures and radio-implantations by R. Valdez <br />and W. Masslich (pers. comm.) were used as reference <br />for our evaluation of spring movements. <br />Habitat descriptors (water temperature, depth, ve- <br />locity, substrate, and general habitat type such as riffle, <br />eddy, shoreline, and flowing or quiet water) were re- <br />corded at the point of fish capture. Water temperature <br />was recorded with hand-held thermometers, velocity <br />was measured at 60% of water depth, depth was mea- <br />sured with a wading rod, and substrate was classified <br />by visual and manual observation. Substrate in the <br />spawning reaches was further described from visual <br />observations taken during periods of low flow. Four <br />thermographs were used to obtain continuous records <br />of river temperatures; two were placed in the lower <br />Yampa River near its confluence with the Green River, <br />and two were placed in the Green River near Jensen, <br />Utah. <br />Radio-implanted fish (Tyus, 1988) were individu- <br />ally identified by a unique signal (frequency and pulse <br />rate) using radio receivers, omni-directional whip and <br /> <br />bi-directional loop antennas. Attempts were made to <br />locate the radiotagged fish each week from mid-April <br />to early August 1987 and 1988, using airplanes and <br />boats. Location (km) and microhabitat data (depth, <br />velocity, substrate) were taken at the triangulated sig- <br />nal source if the fish remained in one position for 30 <br />min. After the 30-min period, each fish was disturbed <br />by wading or probing with a rod to confirm its location, <br />ensure that it was alive, and to collect substrate data. <br />Fish movements and recaptures occurring within a <br />spawning reach or remaining near the initial contact <br />were classed as "local," and movements between rivers <br />or spawning reaches were classed as "migrations." Fish <br />movements to and from a spawning reach in the spring <br />were considered spawning migrations. Numbers, cap- <br />ture dates, and locations of native ripe flannelmouth <br />suckers (Catostomus latipinnis), bluehead suckers (Ca- <br />tostomus discobolus), and putative razorback x flan- <br />nelmouth sucker hybrids were recorded in 1989. <br /> <br />RESUL Ts-A total of 230 adult razorback suck- <br />ers were captured from 1987 to 1989. Of these, <br />125 fish received new Carlin-dangler tags, and <br />70 fish were recaptured on 105 occasions (24 fish <br />were recaptured more than once). Most razor- <br />back suckers (84%, n = 194) were ripe and in- <br />cluded 74% males (n = 144,69 recaptures) and <br />26% females (n = 50, 18 recaptures). An addi- <br />tional six fish (two recaptures) were tuberculate <br />but did not have expressible sex products. Total <br />lengths of all razorback suckers ranged from 405 <br />to 597 mm. Males averaged 507 mm TL (n = <br />140, SD = 23.76) and 1,370 g (n = 136, SD = <br />200.9); females averaged 547 mm TL (n = 45, <br />SD = 20.56) and 1,686 g (n = 43, SD = 296.98). <br />Spawning Habits-Ripe male razorback suck- <br />ers were tuberculate on the anal and caudal fins <br />and along the sides of the caudal peduncle. Some <br />ripe females were lightly tuberculate in these same <br />areas, but most were not. Recaptures within a <br />season indicated that the appearance of breeding <br />tubercles in males was closely followed by a readi- <br />ness to spawn and that tubercles began to fade <br />soon after the fish were spent (four ripe, heavily <br />tuberculate males were recaptured 11 to 35 days <br />later at which time they were not ripe and only <br />lightly tuberculate). <br />Razorback suckers were most readily captured <br />in two areas between mid-April and early June: <br />the Jensen site (km 486.4 to 504.0) and the Yam- <br />pa site (lower 5 km of the Yampa River, Fig. 1). <br />A total of 177 razorback suckers (91% of all <br />breeding captures) was captured at the Jensen <br />site and 14 fish (7% of all breeding captures) were <br />captured at the Yampa site. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />" <br />