My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8198
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:35:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8198
Author
Tyus, H. M., C. W. Brown and J. F. Saunders
Title
Movements of Young Colorado Pikeminnow and Razorback Sucker in Response to Water Flow and Light Level
USFW Year
2000
USFW - Doc Type
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
tended to move upstream. There was no discernable pattern of movement <br />(DA) in the presence of a slow flow during the day. <br />Moderate flow <br />With increased water flow, TA of smaller larvae (CP1, CP2, RZ1) was <br />stimulated at night (Figure 2). Furthermore, TA was similar among the life <br />stages; three-week old larvae showed as much activity as the 36-week old <br />juveniles. During the day, TA had no consistent pattern. However, all fish <br />stages showed downstream movement at night in the presence of moderate <br />flows. In daylight, moderate flow also produced a tendency for net <br />downstream movement of larvae. <br />Juvenile Colorado pikeminnow <br />The 36-week old juvenile pikeminnow (CP4) were very active in day <br />and night conditions and TA reached a relatively steady value in less than <br />15 minutes, even in the absence of flow. The introduction of a small flow <br />caused the pattern to stabilize more quickly at night, and the direction of <br />movement was strongly affected by flow. In the control trials, there was no <br />net movement upstream or downstream during the night in the absence of <br />flow, and there was only a slight tendency for upstream movement at day. <br />With a slow flow, there was a general trend for upstream movement at <br />night and downstream movement at day. When the flow was increased to <br />moderate, daytime movements tended to be downstream, but visual <br />observations indicated that the movements appeared to be searching (i.e., <br />alternating down- and upstream movement) rather than directed. However, <br />night movements were in the downstream direction (Figure 3). <br /> <br />>_ 1 <br />:. <br />U <br />a <br />o <br />d <br />.~ <br />U <br />m -1 <br />-2 <br />-4 <br />-3 <br />3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 <br />Time Elapsed, min <br />®Night ~ Day <br />Figure 3. Average directed activity of 36-week Colorado pikeminnow with <br />moderate flows at 3 min intervals after trial initiation in an <br />experimental tank. The 95% CL shown for each category. <br />531 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.