Laserfiche WebLink
<br />An Instream Flow Philosophy for Recovering <br />Endangered Colorado River Fishes <br /> <br />Harold M. Tyus <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />p.o. Box 25486 Denver Federal Center <br />Denver, Colorado 80225 <br /> <br />ABSTRACT: Remnant stocks of some endangered Colorado River fishes per- <br />sist, including Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila <br />cypha), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), and bony tail (Gila elegans). Recovery <br />of these species to a nonendangered status is problematic. Provision of flows to <br />maintain habitats in which the fish are declining may do little to slow their <br />decline or prevent their loss. It is argued that determination of instream flows <br />for endangered fishes should be based on the premise that the fish are not <br />occupying optimal, or perhaps even acceptable habitats, a philosophically dif- <br />ferent approach than that addressed by prevailing flow methodologies. A re- <br />covery rather than survival philosophy is recommended that includes devel- <br />oping instream flow needs through a combination of empirical studies, <br />simulations, and assessments. <br /> <br />KEY WORDS: Endangered species, Gila elegans, Gila cypha, instream flow, pty- <br />chocheilus lucius, stream habitat, Xyrauchen texanus. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Severe, long-term, and adverse impacts this form of habitat deterioration, prompt- <br />have changed historic fish habitats and ing the American Fisheries Society to state <br />stocks in North America. Populations of that alteration of streamflows is the major <br />native fishes are declining and some are factor in the loss of stream fishery re- <br />faced with extinction. During the past 100 sources in North America (Peters 1981; Tyus <br />years, 3 genera, 27 species, and 13 subspe- 1990). It is unknown whether the rate of <br />cies of fishes have become extinct due to loss of these natural faunas can be reduced <br />physical habitat alteration and concomi- because community-level disturbances of- <br />tant fish introductions (Miller et a1. 1989). ten result from species extirpations. The <br />An additional 364 rare fishes in Canada, fate of native Colorado River fishes in the <br />the United States, and Mexico are threat- southwestern United States is of particular <br />ened with extinction (Williams et a1. 1989). concern, because widespread and drastic <br />In a 10-year review of fishes of threatened, habitat loss has had severe impacts on this <br />endangered, or special concern listed by unique fauna (Carlson and Muth 1989). <br />Deacon et a1. (1979), Williams et a1. (1989) The Colorado River basin, encompassing <br />found that 139 new taxa warranted pro- about X2 of the land mass of the continental <br />tection, but not a single species had been United States, is located in extremely arid <br />removed from the original list by success- country (McAllister et a1. 1986) and its wa- <br />ful recovery efforts. ters are a precious commodity. Waters of <br />There are few rivers remaining in North the Colorado River were diverted for ag- <br />America in which annual flow patterns ricultural use by Native Americans, but <br />have not been severely altered. Stream these diversions increased exponentially <br />fishes have been particularly affected by with subsequent settlement. Many such di- <br /> <br />I Rivers. Volume 3, Number 1 <br /> <br />Pages 27 -36 <br /> <br />27 II~ <br />