My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9658
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9658
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:35:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9658
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and K. L. Orchard.
Title
Report A - Geomorphic Analysis In Support of a Channel-Maintenance Flow Recommendation for the White River Near Watson, Utah Draft Report.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />reach (Table 4), D50 ranged from 20 to 90 nun. Particle sizes were coarsest in the small <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />riffle located at the extreme downstream end of the reach, and were finest near the center <br /> <br />of the reach (Fig. 15) Average boundary shear stress generated by the bankfull discharge <br /> <br />of 105 m3/s (3700 fels) was sufficient to mobilize sediment similar to the sizes of <br /> <br />particles found on 3 of the 6 representative pebble count locations in the study site when <br /> <br />assuming t* 50 = 0.034 ('Fig. 16). The mobilized sites are located on the cobble bar that is <br /> <br />in the riffle near cross-section 5 and 6, and had D50 values of 20, 24, and 32 nun. The <br /> <br />location with the D50 of 32 nun was predicted to mobilize at discharges equal to bankfull, <br /> <br />while the two sites with finer D50 would mobilize near 28 m3/s, which is 27% of bankfull. <br /> <br />The other 3 sites, which have D50 values of 66, 81, and 90 nun, were not predicted to be <br /> <br />mobilized at a discharge of 160 m3/s. When assuming t*50 = 0.060, only one gravel bar <br /> <br />was predicted to move at bankfull discharge. At 160 m3/s (5700 fels) only 2 of the 6 bars <br /> <br />were predicted to mobilize. <br /> <br />Analysis of Sediment Records-Effective Discharge <br /> <br />Sediment transport on the White River was measured between 1975 and 1990. <br /> <br />The strong correlation (r = 0.77) of this relationship (Fig. 17) describes the increased <br /> <br />ability of the river to transport sediment at increasingly higher discharges. We <br /> <br />extrapolated this sediment transport rating relation to the entire available discharge <br /> <br />record and found that the majority of sediment transported by the White River is carried <br /> <br />by 2 different ranges of discharges; very low discharges of between 11 and 17 m3/s (400 <br /> <br />and 600 rels), and moderate discharges around 60 m3/s (2100 fefs) (Fig. 18). Discharges <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.