Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Yampa River, are common in this portion of the <br />Green; the red shiner (Notropis lutrensis) is rare <br />in the Yampa, but is abundant in the lower reaches <br />of the Green River in the Monum~nt and downstream. <br />We collected two juvenile squawfish in the Green <br />River at Jensen, Utah, in October 1975 and the <br />Squawfish Recovery Team captured several below <br />Jensen in May 1976. Thus, conditions appear suita- <br />ble for at least limited reproductive success <br />downstream from the Monument, but not upstream. <br />The species composition appears to reflect the <br />differences in the habitats that were described <br />above. <br /> <br />CURRENT STATUS OF ENDANGERED AND THREATENED <br />ENDEMIC FISH OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER <br />SYSTEM <br /> <br />The decline of the four endemic fish species <br />of the upper Colorado River may be attributable <br />to various factors. The following outline lists <br />some of the possible causes contributing to the <br />decline of these species. <br /> <br />I. Stream Alteration <br /> <br />A. Dams <br /> <br />1. Physical obstructions to movement <br />and migration. <br /> <br />2. Flow Patterns - more stable on <br />annual basis, less stable on a <br />daily basis. <br /> <br />a. Loss of the scouring effect <br />from peak flows. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Loss of flows that may elicit <br />spawning migration or be- <br />havior. <br /> <br />c. Effect on other habitat char- <br />acteristics such as changes <br />in substrate, river morpholo- <br />gy, and riparian vegetation. <br /> <br />3. Temperatures - cooler in summer, <br />warmer in winter. <br /> <br />4. Turbidity - reduced downstream. <br /> <br />5. Reservoirs <br /> <br />a. Not suitable for successful <br />reproduction of large-river <br />fish. <br /> <br />b. Favor other species. <br /> <br />B. Irrigation <br /> <br />1. Increased leaching of the soil <br />resulting in increased salinity <br />through return flows. <br /> <br />2. Changes in water quality due to <br />the addition of fertilizers, <br />pesticides, and other materials. <br /> <br />C. Dewatering (transmountain diversion, <br />evaporation from reservoirs, irriga-, <br />tion, industry, municipal water use, <br />etc.) . <br /> <br />\ 1. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Reduces flow (volume and velo- <br />city) <br /> <br />Concentrates dissolved solids, <br />increasing salinity. <br /> <br />D. Channelization <br /> <br />1. Eliminates slow-mdving back- <br />waters and eddies. <br /> <br />2. Alters species composition. <br /> <br />3. Substrate becomes unstable, ad- <br />versely affecting invertebrates <br />that may serve as a food supply. <br /> <br />E. Unstable Banks (caused by livestock <br />grazing, roads, and other activities <br />of man) alter river morphology. <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />Competition and predation are increased <br />by introduction of non-native fish spe- <br />cies. <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />Pollution and Eutrophication <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Industrial, agricultural, and munici- <br />pal wastes that may be toxic may <br />increase. <br />Water quality may change --in par- <br />ticular salinity and sedimentation <br />may increase. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />IV. Other Factors <br /> <br />A. Parasites may be introduced by exotic <br />fish species. <br /> <br />B. Food organisms may change in species <br />composition and abundance with <br />changes in stream habitat. <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Fishing pressure may be too heavy on <br />large, adult Colorado squawfish and <br />the bony tail and humpback chubs, <br />which are very vulnerable to sport <br />fishing. <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish - Whereas this species was <br />once abundant throughout the Colorado River sys- <br />tem, with a range extending from Wyoming to the <br />Gulf of California, it is now rare and restricted <br />to parts of the upper basin (Fig. 2). A few <br />squawfish may exist below Lake Powell, but the <br />exist~nce of self-sustaining populations is doubt- <br />ful. The occurrence of this species in the San <br />Juan River is also uncertain. It is no longer <br />found in the now clear, cooler waters of the <br />Green River above the confluence with the Yampa <br />River, but adults were collected in the lower <br />Yampa in 1968-71 and 1974-75 during July and Aug- <br />ust after water temperatures reached 20-21 C <br />(Holden 1973, McAda and Seetha1er 1975). Most <br />captured squawfish have been males; no ripe fe- <br />males have been collected. However, several <br />squawfish believed to be spent females were col- <br />lected in the Yampa between Cross Mountain and <br />the confluence of the Little Snake River, and a <br />fisherman reported to us of catching a ripe fe- <br />male in early August 1975 at this same location. <br />These suspected females were captured in deeper <br />water than most of the males, which tended to <br />congregate in shallow eddies near the bank. <br /> <br />It has been assumed that the movement of squaw- <br />fish into the Yampa River during the summer is a <br />spawning migration. It is also commonly assumed <br />that this migration is triggered by some seasonal <br />factor or factors such as temperature, turbidity~ <br />flow, photoperiod, or water chemistry. <br /> <br />. Spawning has not been observed ~n the ~urbid <br />lriver waters. At Willow Beach Nat~onal F~sh <br />Hatchery, Arizona, spawning of c~ptive Colorado <br />squawfish occurred but was not d~rectly observed. <br /> <br /> <br />607 <br />