Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/ 14/01 draft report, Schmidt and Box <br /> <br />Hydraulic factors primarily involve the exchange rate of water between the main flow and <br />backwaters, and field studies of the longitudinal dispersion of dye can be applied, because the <br />behavior of floating or neutrally-buoyant particles is similar to that of dye clouds (see Fischer 1973, <br />table 1). The exchange of water with backwaters, called "dead zones" in fluid mechanics literature, <br />is responsible for the time lag between passage of the peak concentration, centroid of mass, and <br />trailing edge of longitudinally-dispersing dye clouds in natural rivers (Fischer et al. 1979). <br />Skewness of the dye cloud increases as the size and number of dead zones increases (Valentine and <br />Wood 1977). Thus, increased number of backwaters should lead to slower average drift rates, <br />which has been shown on the Pecos River in New Mexico where the rate of downstream drift is <br />slower in reaches with complex shoreline topography (Dudley and Platania 2oo0b). <br />Some parts of the middle Green River include large recirculating eddies that are similar to <br />those that occur in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon (Schmidt and Rubin 1995). Graf (1995) <br />showed that recirculating eddies in the Grand Canyon are not dead zones and that dye clouds <br />display less longitudinal dispersion in Grand Canyon than in alluvial rivers. The exchange rate of <br />water between eddies and the main flow increases as discharge increases, and skewness of the main <br />dye cloud decreases during floods (Konieczki et al. 1997). <br />Backwaters used by Colorado pikeminnow are within-channel features and do not occur on <br />the floodplain, because drift occurs during the receding limb of the annual flood. Backwaters occur <br />along crenulated banks at flows near bankfull, and backwaters occur in the embayments of <br />irregularly-shaped alluvial sand bars at moderate and low flows (Fig. 3). Thus, the number, size, <br />and characteristics of backwaters at the time of larval drift are primarily linkedto the topography <br />and distribution of alluvial bars (Rakowski 1997). Backwaters are typically larger and more <br />frequent in wide alluvial reaches between Jensen and Ouray, and sampling pi\~~~ish in late <br />summer and fall is concentrated there (Muth et al.20oo). '\ \JJr';<"~ <br />Hydrology and Drift between 1990 and 1995 \ rw \ l./ <br />The 6 years of field data span a range of flow and drift conditions. Runoff was greatest in <br />1995 and was least in 1992 and 1994 (Table 1). Larvae began entering the Green River later in <br />1~5 than in other years, and the discharge at that time was about 300 m3s't, at least 3 times more <br />than in other years (Fig. 4). Runoff was nearly as large in 1993, but larvae entered the Green River <br />afterrecession to basenow. The number of drifting larvae in 1991, 1992,1993, and 1995 was <br />between 500,000 and 700,000 (Table 2). In 1994, there was an order of magnitude fewer drifting. <br />- . <br />larvae. In 1990, there were 1,100,000 drifting larVae. Thus, 1994 was a year of very low discharge <br />and few larvae, 1992 was a year of very low discharge and an average number of larvae, 1995 was a <br />year of very large discharge and an average number of larvae, 1990 was an average runoff year with <br />a very large number of larvae, and 1991 and 1993 were years when runoff and the number of larvae <br />were about average. <br /> <br />rJ., <br /> <br />y.' <br /> <br />\ 'l <br /> <br />\" <br />J 1 <br />;---- ' <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />IIIl... <br />