Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/14/01 draft report, Schmidt and Box <br /> <br />flows on the middle Green River are increased and larval fish enter the Green River at much higher <br />flows than are typical. <br />We evaluated the sensitivity of larval fish populations to discharge of the Green River by <br />predicting the longitudinal distribution of larval fish under a range of scenarios where a cohort of <br />100,000 fish enter the Green River on different days of 1992. The days at which fish were <br />simulated to enter the river were between May 18 and July 17, and the discharge on those days <br />varied between 45 and 207 m3s-1. We compared the predicted number of fish on September 15 <br />throughout the study area and the proportion of that population located in reach 265250. <br />The total population of larval fish in the study area is very sensitive to river discharge. The <br />total number of fish in the study area on September 15 is predicted to vary between about12% of <br />the total drift when drift enters the Green River at about 50 m3s-1 to about 1 % of the total driftwhen <br />drift enters the Green River at about 200 m3s-1 (Fig. 14). The total number of fish predicted to <br />occur in the study area is well predicted by <br />y = 46882 - 20134 (log x) (5) <br />where y is total number of fish predicted to occur in the study area on September 15 resulting from <br />a cohort of 100,000 fish introduced into the Green River on 1 day and x is the discharge of the <br />Green River, in cubic meters per second, on the day the fish first enter the river. The R2 of this <br />relationship is 0.85. <br />The proportion of larval fish occurring in reach 265250 increases with discharge from 0.16 <br />to 0.22 for the same range of discharges. This relationship is <br />y = 0.031782 + 0.083034 (log x) (6) <br />where y is the proportion of the total number oflarval fish in the study area that occur in reach <br />265250 on September 15 and x is the same as in (5). The R2 of this relationship is 0.58. <br />These simulations demonstrate that the timing of larvaLdrift in relation to discharge of the <br />middle Green River is probably a critical determinant of the number of fish retained in the study <br />area. The natural timing of drift is such that larval fish enter the middle Green River when river <br />discharge is relatively low and shoreline complexity is high. In some years, however, dam <br />operations result in artificially high river discharges in the middle Green River. These high <br />discharges have the potential to transport larval fish beyond the study area. . <br />The Value of Simulations <br />It was necessary to make many assumptions in the process of developing the simulation <br />model, and one might question the utility of this model. We were forced to make many <br />assumptions about the characteristics of physical and ecological processes, because field data about <br />these processes have not been previously collected. We were forced to make assumptions about the <br />relative importance of physical and biological processes in controllingthe abundance and <br />distribution of}arval pikeminnow. <br /> <br />16 <br />