My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7605
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7605
Author
Schaeffer, L.
Title
Avian Predators at ODFW Hatcheries
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
Their Identification and Control.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The avian predators that account for the largest loss of <br />production at one ODFW facility are the gulls and cormorants <br />inhabiting the area around Wahkeena Pond. These birds have <br />become even more efficient and effective as predators by <br />combining their effort. Hatchery workers have seen cormorants <br />swim under submerged netting in an enclosure at the pond to get <br />to the fish. The cormorants scare fish into unprotected areas <br />where the more numerous gulls can get at them. Some of the more <br />exotic species reported on the questionnaire were ravens, <br />magpies, and starlings. Not commonly known to eat fish, these <br />birds were reported preying on small fish at only a few <br />hatcheries, but they caused little damage. <br /> <br />control Measures <br /> <br />Frightening Devices <br /> <br />Present control measures for avian predators fall into two <br />general categories: frightening devices and physical barriers. <br />Frightening devices are not specific to anyone type of predator. <br />Almost every hatchery has used or presently uses some kind of <br />frightening device. Devices at ODFW facilities now and in the <br />past include: <br /> <br />1. Cracker shells or other explosives, whether exploded by an <br />automatic device at regular intervals or by personnel at <br />random intervals. <br /> <br />2. Strobe lights, drop lights, or rotating beams on timers. <br /> <br />3. Water spray devices that break up the water surface. <br /> <br />4. Balloons painted with eyes that mimic the birds' own <br />predators. <br /> <br />5. Audio alarms such as whistles or distress calls that <br />mimic bird noises. <br /> <br />6. Owl decoys, similar to scarecrows used in farmers <br />fields. <br /> <br />7. Increased human presence. <br /> <br />8. Rock throwing. <br /> <br />9. Combinations of these devices and activities. <br /> <br />Every facility admitted that these devices are ineffective <br />or of limited use. Once the birds realize that the devices <br />cannot cause them harm, they ignore them. The devices are most <br />effective when they are used for a limited time, are used in <br />combination, or are moved frequently. The more irregular the <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.