My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8150
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8150
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:34:31 AM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8150
Author
Wydoski, R. S.
Title
Realistic Management of Endangered Species--An Overview.
USFW Year
1977.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />232 <br /> <br />C. H. THEILING <br /> <br />Off-Bank Revetments <br />Channel~ <br /> <br /> <br />Natural Bank <br /> <br />Unmodified Bank <br /> <br />Channel <br /> <br /> <br />. Rock <br /> <br />Figure 5. Schematic ilIustrations of three common bankline configurations in the Upper Mississippi River System <br /> <br />current velocity and structurally complex habitat south of the Missouri river. They attract or support large <br />numbers offish (Farabee, 1986; Baker et aI., 1991) and also provide substrate for invertebrates. Organic drift <br />trapped in dike-created eddies may help support local invertebrate and fish populations, though the <br />ecological importance of the effect has not been fully evaluated (Sparks, 1991). <br /> <br />Wing dikes <br />Stone dikes (wing dikes) extending perpendicular from the bank were constructed to constrict flow to the <br />main channel during periods of low discharge (Chen and Simons, 1986). Sediment accumulation between <br />dikes caused rapid river bed aggradation and terrestrial conversion in lentic habitats between dikes (Neimi <br />and Strauser, 1991). Loss of lentic habitat has reduced fish habitat value throughout the reach below the <br />Missouri River. <br />Experimentation with dike alterations started with notches of various sizes, shapes and locations cut in <br />existing structures (Neimi and Strauser, 1991). Scouring downstream of the dike was expected to reduce bed <br />agradation. Physical evaluations of dike modifications showed unexpected results in that topographic/ <br />bathymetric diversity was greater than expected (Neimi and Strauser, 1991). Cursory ecological evaluations <br />of modified structures (Atwood, E. R., Illinois Department of Conservation pers. comm.) and extrapola tions <br />from similar structures (Farabee, 1986; Baker et al., 1991) indicate they at least support a greater number of <br />fish species, and usually higher abundances, compared with other available habitats. <br /> <br />Bank revetments <br />Bankline revetments (rip-rap; Figure 5) are used to eliminate the tendency for the main channel to migrate <br />within the floodplain because channel movement can disrupt commercial navigation. Standard revetments <br />use coarse grade rock to stabilize bank positions by eliminating downcutting (River bed erosion) at the base <br />of the bank. Typical installation requires substantial bank clearing and grading that is both expensive and <br />environmentally damaging (Neimi and Strauser, 1991). An alternative bank stabilization being tested is off- <br />bankline revetments (Neimi and Strauser, 1991). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.