Laserfiche WebLink
<br />86 trout per ha (56 to 213 per ac). Rainbow trout that were stocked, including <br />both spring and fall spawn, ranged in size from 44 to 573 per kg (20 to 260 per Ib). <br />From these plants the yield to the fisherman in pounds varied from a low <br />153,800 kg (339,000 Ibs) to a high ofapproximately 367,400 kg (810,000 Ibs). As <br />has been noted, catch rates varied from almost 1.3 fish per hour to a low of 0.5 <br />fish per hour. <br /> <br />As a result ofthe development of nongame fish species, in particular the Utah <br />chub, plus changing physical conditions in the reservoir which precluded a <br />single species management concept, additional game fish species were <br />introduced. To provide a game fish that would take advantage of the abundant <br />chub population, especially in the inflow area, brown trout (Salmo trutta) were <br />introduced, Food habit studies have since indicated that this species has <br />capi talized on this abundant food base and provides trophy-size fish to the catch. <br />Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) a more efficient plankton feeder than the chub <br />was also introduced. In addition to the plants of salmonids and to take <br />advantage of the chub forage base available in the littoral zone during summer, <br />smallmouth and largemouth bass introduction programs are currently <br />underway. At the time of this writing, the success of these latter stockings has <br />not been evaluated; however, there is information verifying limited populations <br />of smallmouth bass. In addition to the stocked salmonids, lake trout and <br />cutthroat trout occupy the reservoir through immigration, Findings over the <br />first nine years of work noted that as the reservoir aged, an imbalance in the <br />biological pyramid developed with a substantial bulk of the fishery population <br />being made up of nondesirable components. To increase the magnitude of <br />desirable components and decrease the size of undesirable components, the <br />following recommendations were made and essentially implemented. <br /> <br />1, Increase the average size of rainbow trout planted to five inches. <br /> <br />2. Introduce a littoral area predator that would capitalize upon nongame fish <br />species found in these areas during the summer months and would provide a <br />summer fishery. <br /> <br />3. Introduce a forage species that would compete with Utah chub by more <br />effectively utilizing plankton resources, Ideally, it should also serve as <br />forage for the salmonid species, especially during the summer. <br /> <br />It is interesting to note that at the time of this writing, the lake trout, not <br />introduced, has developed as a trophy species. Although this species does not <br />now contribute in significant numbers to the catch, it is considered a valuable <br />additon to the sport fishery, <br /> <br />White sucker populations have developed to the point that they could become a <br />significant problem in the future, This species was not collected in <br />preimpoundment studies, It has become established in some tributary lakes of <br />the middle Green River drainage in Wyoming, probably from fisherman <br />introductions via the Platte River system, and thus into Flaming Gorge <br />Reservoir, At the time of this writing, the Utah chub appears to be the most <br />significant deterrent to a productive salmonid fishery and has dictated <br />management programs in reaction to its abundance. <br /> <br />Redside shiners have maintained their position of abundance in the spectrum of <br />fish populations both in pre- and post-impoundment estimates. However, this <br />species does not appear to be a significant interspecific competitor, nor does it <br /> <br />8 <br />