<br />.
<br />
<br />have replaced the Gila spinedace (Medafulgida), and exotic mosquito fish (Garn-
<br />busia affinis) have replaced the Gila topminnow (Poeeiliopsis oeeidentalis oeci-
<br />dentalis) in the Gila drainage. Mosquitofish also have replaced desert pupfish in
<br />the Salton Sea, and exotic largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and sailfin
<br />mollies (Poecilia latipinna) have replaced Moapa dace (Moapa eoriaeea) and
<br />White River springfish (Creniehthys baileyl) (Minckley & Deacon 1968; Minckley
<br />1973; Deacon 1979). Minckley (1979) believes that the greatest impact is in
<br />predation on juvenile natives, especially by juvenile exotics. In some cases,
<br />hybridisation between native and exotic species has "swamped" the native gene
<br />pool (e,g, rainbow X cut-throat trout: Behnke & Benson 1980). Further, range
<br />restrictions and habitat change~, including the effects of exotic species, may be
<br />enhanced by hybridisation between native species (e.g. razorback X flannel-
<br />mouth sucker: Hubbs & Miller 1953; Tyus et al. 1982).
<br />Exotics have been especially successful in reservoirs (Stanford & Ward 1986b)
<br />and closely regulated segments (Stanford & Ward 1986a: Fig, 1). The major
<br />fisheries in Lower Basin reservoirs involve the planktivorous threadfin shad,
<br />which provides food for largemouth (Micropterus salmoides) and striped
<br />bass (Morone saxatilis) (Dill 1944; Kimsey 1957; Minckley 1973). In Upper
<br />Basin reservoirs a host of introduced suckers, minnows and trout are pre-
<br />sent. Throughout the system, introduced fish have become established in the
<br />remaining river segments through stocking or migration from the reservoirs
<br />(Table 2).
<br />The Serial Discontinuity Concept of Ward & Stanford (1983) - the idea that
<br />regulated rivers tend to ecologically reset or mimic upstream or downstream
<br />lotic conditions - predicts that native species should be re-established some
<br />distance downstream from a dam, However, in the Colorado system there may
<br />no longer be sufficient river lengths for this to occur, especially with the presence
<br />of the exotic species, Big-river endemic species survive in the lower Green River
<br />and the mains tern above Lake Powell because conditions approach pre-regulation
<br />conditions, but even these segments are likely to be affected by dams proposed
<br />or under construction on the lower reaches of the Yampa, White, Dolores and
<br />Gunnison rivers,
<br />I
<br />; Productive exotic sport fisheries have been created below several dams:
<br />growth rates of trout reportedly are more than 38--40 cm annually (Wiley &
<br />Duffer 1980). Some fisheries have developed immediately below dams (e,g, Lee
<br />Ferry fishery below Glen Canyon Dam), and others (e,g. lower Gunnison Rivcrl
<br />are most productive some distance downstream from the dam, as cold tern.
<br />peratures in the tailwaters are ameliorated by warm air temperatures and sid~'
<br />flows (Stanford & Ward 1983, 1984).
<br />A productive fishery developed in the Green River below Flaming Gorgt'
<br />. Dam as the reservoir was filling (1962-68), but declined dramatically in respoTl'C
<br />to cold (40C) releases after the reservoir filled (maximum depth 134m), In an
<br />effort to salvage the fishery in 1978 the dam was fitted with multi-level relea'c
<br />
<br />398
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />gates to allow a constant summer tailwater temperature of e. 130 C. Trout
<br />growth increased 3--4 fold in the warmer water (Larson et al. 1980).
<br />The Lee Ferry fishery below Lake Powell involves a simple food chain, and
<br />produces fast-growing rainbow and other introduced trout (Plate Ig). The clear,
<br />nutrient-laden water from the hypolimnion of Lake Powell stimulates growths of
<br />the green alga Cladophora glomerata on the river bottom, sustaining high produc-
<br />tion of introduced amphipods (Gammarus laeustris; see Ward et al. 1986), in
<br />turn fed upon by trout. This fishery extends well into the Grand Canyon and is
<br />a very different trophic system to the one that existed before impoundment.
<br />
<br />Conclusion
<br />
<br />The indigenous fish of the Colorado system have few marine affinities (Miller
<br />1958) and are 85% endemic (66% at the species level), suggesting long isolation.
<br />For some forms, however, survival may depend on artificial propagation
<br />(Greger & Deacon 1982; Hammon & Inslee 1982), The system now is so altered
<br />by regulation that questions about ecology of fish in the virgin river are largely
<br />academic. Non-native species abound throughout, and the prospect for further
<br />introductions is strong. Populations will likely fluctuate widely as interspecific
<br />competition and the ecological consequences of regulation differentiate "winners
<br />and losers".
<br />Many research opportunities remain. Relationships between processes in
<br />reservoirs and tail waters and successful fish populations are little understood.
<br />The life histories and needs of forage organisms and factors controlling primary
<br />productivity must be related to the fish communities, especially if sport species
<br />are to be preferred, The regulated Colorado system provides experimental
<br />macrocosms in which organism-level (e.g. gene expression) or ecosystem-level
<br />(e.g. reservoir influences) theories may be tested (cf. Ward & Stanford 1984),
<br />Answers to these questions may help to couple the benefits of regulation with
<br />the natural attributes of the system.
<br />
<br />Acknowledgements
<br />
<br />We thank Dr R. Behnke and G. Wilde for reviewing the manuscript and R.
<br />Valdez, J. Rinne, W. Dreyer, J. Johnson, C. Carlson, R. Harris and G. Bryant
<br />for unpublished material.
<br />
<br />References
<br />
<br />Behnke, R. r 1981. Systematic and zoogeographical interpretation of Great Basin trouts. In R. J.
<br />NallJ1an & D. L. Soltz (eds). FIshes in North AmerIcan Deserts. John Wiley & Sons, N,Y.:
<br />95-124. '
<br />
<br />399
<br />
|