Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t, <br />. ' <br /> <br />\ ; <br /> <br />;,' \,. <br /> <br />.~ S+cJ~~ <br />t.ct, ~. <br /> <br />'j ~, ".\ \ <br /> <br />+._~, .. . r. <br />- \ ,:".r ",_, c"' , 'c, . '\ \ I I',~., <br />, U "u \'1 I q ,~ <br /> <br />Methodologies <br />for Preserving <br />Instrearn Flows, <br />The Incremental <br />Method <br /> <br />0:;. I '.'. <~v-, <br /> <br />r:_..~1.-->.,""'-''- Co.'::, . ^ <br /> <br />Clair B. Stalnaker, Ph.D. <br />Cooperative Instrea?n Flow Seruice Group <br />Fort Collins, Colorado <br /> <br />At first glance, there appear to be few common <br />features among various riverine habitat alterations' <br />~tre~m dewatering, flow augmentation, channel~ <br />lzatJOn, bank stabilization, habitat improve- <br />ment, or sedimentation. Each appears to be a unique <br />problem, requiring a unique solution. However, each <br />of these problems involves some alteration of river <br />hydraulics, and the responses of different species to <br />those changes. Thus, it is possible to utilize standard <br />methodological approaches in the solution of these <br />problems. The IFG incremental methodology is rather <br />unique in attempting to provide physical analyses <br />appropriate for most all riverine assessment pro- <br />cedures. It allows quantification of the amount of <br />physical habitat available for a fish species and life <br />history phase, in a given reach of stream, at different <br />stream flow regimes. This paper is meant to provide a <br /> <br />Clair B. Stalnaker <br /> <br />D~. Clair Stalnaker has been actively involved <br />with the administration of multi-disciplinaryand <br />aquatic r~search programs including systems <br />and aquatic ecology management, instream flow <br />methodology assessments, and the physical <br />aspe~ts of stream ecology. Before assuming the <br />position of Group Leader, Cooperative Instream <br />F~ow Service Group, Fort Collins, Colorado. he <br />dlfected graduate research and taught fishery <br />m~nagement courses at Utah State University <br />with the Cooperative Fishery Research Unit and <br />served as Fishery Research Specialist with the <br />c Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration Pro- <br />gram of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He <br />rec~ive~ his B.S..in Forestry from West Virginia <br />U~/versltya,!dhls. Ph.D. in Animal Ecology from <br />North Car91lna State University. <br /> <br />LI <br /> <br />~ o'7Cf /(; <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br /> <br />brief introduction of the IFG incremental method- <br />ology to UMRBC fishery and water management <br />personnel. <br /> <br />The incremental method was developed by per- <br />sonnel of the Cooperative Instream Flow Service <br />Group (IFG), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort <br />Collins, Colorado. The IFG incremental method allows <br />quantification of the amount of potential physical <br />habitat available for fish species and life history <br />phases in a given reach of stream, at different stream- <br />flow regimes with 'different channel configurations <br />and slopes. <br /> <br />This method is composed of four components: <br />(1) simulation of the stream, (2) determination of the <br />distribution of combinations of depths, velocities, <br />substrates, and cover objects, by area, (3) determi- <br />nation of a composite probability of use for each combi- <br />nation of depth, velocity, substrate, and cover (where <br />applicable) found within the stream reach, for each <br />species and life history phase under investigation; and <br />(4) the calculation of a weighted usable area (roughly a <br />habitat's carrying capacity based on physical <br />conditions alone) for each discharge, species, and life <br />history phase under investigation. Detailed <br />information papers are referenced and are available <br />from the IFG. <br /> <br />Stream Reach Simulation <br /> <br />Several hydraulic simulation techniques, with <br />varying input data requirements and levels of <br />accuracy are routinely used in assessment of instream <br />flow requirements. A thorough discussion of the <br />theory and field data requirements for stream simula- <br />tion is found in Bovee and Milhous (1978). <br /> <br />Several computer 'programs are available, which <br />can predict the hydraulic param.eters of depth, <br />velocity, width, and stage for different discharges. <br /> <br />1 <br />