My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8283
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8283
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8283
Author
Silk, N., J. McDonald and R. Wigington.
Title
Turning Instream Flow Water Rights Upside Down.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Boulder, CO\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />river's ecological health. Reservations that go beyond what a river can tolerate <br />will defeat the purpose of an upside-down instream flow water right. <br /> <br />· Upside-down instream flow water rights can be combined with the purchase of <br />existing water rights, which are then transferred to instream flows or retired. <br />Generally, any transfer of any existing water right to instream flows, no <br />differently than a transfer to some other use, must not injure any junior water <br />right, while senior rights usually will not be affected because of their priority. <br />Where there are no or very few water rights intervening in priority, the purchase <br />and retirement of a pre-existing water right would increase the amount of <br />remaining natural flows protected by an upside-down instream flow water right. <br /> <br />· The conflicts posed by federal reserved rights and regulatory schemes to protect <br />instream flows are amenable to upside-down settlements, and this approach need <br />not be limited to water rights appropriated under state law, or to water rights as <br />property, at all. <br /> <br />It is well past the time to acknowledge that river flows should be legally protected <br />within the patterns of nature. Natural flow patterns need legal protection or we will leave <br />our western rivers barren of the richness that has endowed civilization from the <br />beginnings of time. We must begin by understanding each river's unique natural flow <br />regime and current degree of alteration and then consider whether a conventional or an <br />upside-down instream flow water right (or a combination of both) works best to protect <br />the natural pattern. Whether this natural pattern is legally protected rightside up or <br />upside-down, we must strike a balance based on what the stream will bear. <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />Allan, J. D., and A. S. Flecker. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters: <br />Identifying the major factors that threaten destruction of riverine species and ecosystems. <br />Bioscience 43(1 ):32-43. <br /> <br />Amman, D., B. Cosens, and 1. Specking. 1995. Negotiation of the Montana-National <br />Park Service Compact. Rivers 5(1):35-45. <br /> <br />Collier, M., R. H. Webb, and J. C. Schmidt. 1996. Dams and rivers: Primer on the <br />downstream effect of dams. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey (Circular 1126). <br /> <br />Egler, F. 1973. The Nature a/Vegetation: Its Management and Mismanagement. <br />Northfork, CT. Limited edition (400 copies) in cooperation with the Connecticut <br />Conservation Association. <br /> <br />Gillilan, D., and T. Brown. 1997. Instream Flow Protection: Seeking a Balance in <br />Western Water Uses. Washington, DC: Island Press. <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.