My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8147
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8147
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8147
Author
Scoppettone, G. G.
Title
Interactions Between Native and Nonnative Fishes of the Upper Muddy River, Nevada.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />NATIVE AND NONNATIVE STREAM FISH INTERACTIONS <br /> <br />601 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />south Fork <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />Sampled for relative <br />abundence <br /> <br />Upper <br /> <br />N <br />~20 <br />km <br /> <br />Las <br />Vegas <br />o <br /> <br />115 <br /> <br />N <br />. <br />I <br /> <br />o <br />I <br /> <br />0.5 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />km <br /> <br />Warm <br />Springs <br />Area <br /> <br />Moapa National <br />Wildlife Refuge <br /> <br />FIGURE 1. - Warm Springs, Nevada, area showing stream reaches sampled for relative abundances of adult Moapa <br />dace, Moapa White River springfish, shortfin mollies, and western mosquitofish. Inset shows the relationship of <br />the Muddy River and Warm Springs area to the Colorado River. <br /> <br />mate (Ricker 1975) was used to calculate popu- <br />lation size from recaptures: <br /> <br />N = (M + 1)(C + 1). <br />R + 1 ' <br /> <br />N is population number, M is the number of fish <br />marked, C is the number of fish captured for cen- <br />sus, and R is the number of fish recaptured. <br />Population estimates were made for each reach, <br />and data were expanded to represent the entire <br />nursery stream. At least 15% of each reach of each <br />nursery stream was sampled. <br />Moapa dace did not trap reliably, so mark and <br />recapture was unsuccessful. In December 1984, I <br />counted adult Moapa dace with the aid of mask <br /> <br />and snorkel. Adult fish (2:40 mm TL) were count- <br />ed by snorkeling in an upstream direction. They <br />were generally in open water and not so sensitive <br />to my presence that they were difficult to count. <br />As I moved upstream, displaced fish swam around <br />and downstream from me, and were not counted <br />twice. <br />Spatial overlap in microhabitat. -Spatial mi- <br />crohabitat use by Moapa dace and Moapa White <br />River springfish larvae, juveniles, and adults was <br />determined by quantifying position of the fish in <br />the water column in terms of depth and water <br />velocity. The same quantification was made for <br />juvenile and adult shortfin mollies and western <br />mosquitofish; larvae of these species were as- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.