My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9633
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9633
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9633
Author
Schmidt, J. C. and J. B. Box
Title
Application of a Dynamic Model to Assess Controls on Age-0 Colorado Pikeminnow Distribution in the Middle Green River, Colorado and Utah
USFW Year
2004
USFW - Doc Type
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Pikeminnow Distribution <br /> <br />467 <br /> <br />shoreline complexity is a poor predictor of backwater <br />area, because the metric is sensitive to the number of <br />islands in a reach, and islands do not necessarily create <br />backwaters. Our use of (2) avoids the difficulty of pre- <br />dicting backwater area from Sc. <br />Unfortunately, the shape of the actual relationship <br />between the proportion of the main flow lined by sepa- <br />ration surfaces and SC is unknown and may differ from <br />reach to reach and with temporal changes in bar top- <br />ography. We assumed a linear relationship: <br /> <br />b = 0.15 SC - 0.3. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />The intercept of this relation was defined such that b = 0 <br />when SC = 2 (the minimum possible value of SC). The <br />slope of the relation was arbitrarily chosen, because <br />relevant field measurements are not available. The value <br />of b varies between 0 and 0.6 for typical values of Sc. <br />We based these assumptions on field studies of the <br />longitudinal dispersion of dye because the behavior of <br />neutrally buoyant particles, and thus drifting larvae, is <br />similar to that of dye clouds (Fischer 1973). The ex- <br />change of water with backwaters, called "dead zones," is <br />responsible for the time lag between passage of the peak <br />concentration, centroid of mass, and trailing edge of <br />longitudinally-dispersing dye clouds in natural rivers <br />(Fischer et al. 1979). The cumulative effect of the ex- <br />change of water with backwaters is partly determined by <br />geomorphic attributes of the channel such as SC, be- <br />cause skewness of the dye cloud increases as the size and <br />number of dead zones increases (Valentine and Wood <br />1977). For example, reaches with more complex shore- <br />line topography and more backwaters had slower rates of <br />downstream drift of neutrally buoyant particles on the <br />Pecos River in New Mexico (Dudley and Platania <br />2000b). In debris fan-affected canyons, parts of recir- <br />culating eddies become dead zones at low flow when <br />eddy bars are emergent. However, recirculating eddies in <br />the Colorado River in Grand Canyon are not dead zones, <br />and dye clouds display less longitudinal dispersion than <br />in alluvial rivers (Graf 1995). <br />Estimates ofb were made for the 10 reaches, based on <br />measurements of SC (Figure 7). These measurements of <br />SC were originally made to characterize habitat com- <br />plexity in 575 km of the Green River between the <br />Colorado River confluence and the upstream end of <br />reach D (Schmidt 1994) and were made from aerial <br />photographs (nominal scale 1:2000) taken in late sum- <br />mer 1963 at base flows between 10 and 28 m3 s -1 in <br />alternating 15-km reaches. SC measurements for four of <br />these reaches, comprising 35 percent of the study area <br />(Table 3), were taken from these data. Elsewhere, we <br />used Schmidt's (1994) Green River average SC values <br /> <br />for three planform types. These planform types were: <br />meandering with a wide alluvial valley (called restricted <br />meanders by Ikeda [1989]), meandering with a narrow <br />alluvial valley (called fixed meanders by Ikeda [1989]), <br />or debris fan-affected canyons where fan-eddy complexes <br />are numerous (Schmidt and Rubin 1995). We assumed <br />no change in river geomorphology since 1963, and we <br />assumed that the relationship was the same in all years. <br />We made assumptions about how SC changes at <br />discharges higher than base flow using geomorphic sur- <br />rogates: the shoreline defined by the contact of wet and <br />dry sand and the shoreline at bankfull stage (Figure 7). <br />Rakowski (1997) found that the former attribute is a <br />consistent feature in various years of photography of the <br />study area, and many studies of sand bar characteristics <br />in the Colorado River in Grand Canyon have used this <br />surrogate (Schmidt, Grams, and Leschin 1999; Goeking, <br />Schmidt, and Webb 2003). <br />The shape of the relationship between discharge and <br />SC was assumed to be unimodal (Figure 7C) and was <br />estimated in the following way. We assumed that com- <br />plexity is a minimum value of 2 when discharge is O. We <br />assumed that the discharge associated with the contact <br />between wet and dry sand was 33 percent of the differ- <br />ence between base flow and bankfull discharge. This <br />assumption may overpredict backwater habitat at the <br />discharges of concern to this model because Rakowski <br />(1997) determined that the contact between wet and <br />dry sand varied between 19 and 22 percent for aerial <br />photographs taken in the early 1990s. We assumed that <br />SC was the same between 0.8 and 1.0 times the bankfull <br />discharge, consistent with the findings of Rakowski <br />(1997). The magnitude of bankfull stage was estimated <br />to be the discharge of the post-dam, two-year recurrence <br />flood. Over-bank conditions are not relevant to the <br />modeling exercise. <br /> <br />Biology. As described in (2), we assumed that larvae <br />intentionally swim into backwaters as well as being <br />transported there by the current, and we parameterized <br />this process as a function of the proportion of the pop- <br />ulation with the ability to swim. We assumed that the <br />ability to swim was directly proportional to the growth <br />rate of the fish because Paulin, Williams, and Tyus <br />(1989) found that swimming ability is linearly related <br />to fish size. Pikeminnow less than 10 mm in length can- <br />not swim upstream against velocities of 10 cm sec - 1, <br />and at 12.2 mm length they begin to control their po- <br />sition in river channels (Paulin et al. 1988). The rate of <br />growth of pike minnow was assumed to be <br /> <br />1 = 0.1l4d + 8.886 <br /> <br />(4) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.