My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9684
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:48 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:07:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9684
Author
Soule, M. E.
Title
Chapter 9 - Thresholds For Survival
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Maintaining Fitness and Evolutionary Potential.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />for the near absence of heterozygosity in a few of these populations; ge- <br />netic drift is almost certainly a contributing factor. The reason for <br />presenting these data is simply to illustrate that the depletion of varia- <br />tion can a.nd does happen in nature, given small enough populations. <br />Incidentally, several workers have pointed out that the number of <br />founders in a colony, so long as it is greater than about five individuals, is <br />not nearly as important as the long-tenn maintenance size of the colony <br />(Chapter 12; Nei et al., 1975; Denniston, 1978). The reason is that a single <br />bottleneck event has much less impact on heterozygosity than does ge- <br />netic drift in a perennially small population. <br />Over how many generations can a small population persist before it <br />has a high probability of going extinct? A possibly useful empirical rule is <br />suggested by the experience of animal breeders. Animal breeders have no- <br />ticed that there is an obvious effect on fecundity in small populations as <br />the inbreeding coefficient approaches 0.5 or 0.6. Using these numbers as <br />arbitrary thresholds, we can estimate the number of generations it will <br />take at various values of ~ before the group becomes susceptible to ex- <br />tinction from genetic causes. Setting l1f equal to 0.6 (or 0.5) in the <br />fonnula <br /> <br />l1f = 1 - (1 _ ~) t <br />2Ne <br />and solving for t, the number of generations, we obtain the rough approxi- <br />mation t::::: 1.5 Ne, or in other words, the expected number of generations <br />to the extinction threShold is about 1.5 times the effective population <br />size. <br /> <br />Effective Population Size and the Basic Rule <br /> <br />The effective application of the basic rule requires more than merely <br />maintaining a stock of 50 or more breeding adults. The reason is that the <br />actual (census) number of adults may not be even close to the effective <br />number. Franklin (Chapter 8) discusses this distinction in some detail, <br />but some further comments and examples will be given here. <br />Breeding structure is absolutely critical. In species with harems, leks <br />or other polygynous systems, the effect of a relatively small number of <br />breeding males is a significant increase in the minimum census number, <br />N, required to reach a desired effective size. It may be quite common for <br />the ratio N / ~ to be 3 or 4, meaning that the minimum size of the colony <br />is 150 to 200 individuals. <br />In species where social inhibition or other factors prevent many <br />adults from breeding, the ratio is even higher. In canids, for example, it is <br />typical for only the dominant pair in the pack to breed (Chapter 14). This <br />applies to the cape hunting dog, Lycaon pictus. In the Serengeti, one of <br />the largest national parks in Mrica, the population of hunting dogs num- <br />bers 30 or so adults. Assuming that these animals are divided among five <br /> <br />162 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.