Laserfiche WebLink
<br />New and Borrowed Strategies <br /> <br />Existing tools cannot do the job alone. Colorado <br />must develop new strategies for river protection. The <br />state is not alone in facing the challenge of river <br />protection and should consider 'borrowing effective <br />strategies from other western states following the same <br />prior appropriation doctrine that applies in Colorado." <br /> <br />. Colorado can no longer afford to manage its water' <br />resoW"ces in a manner that rewards consumption <br />and punishes conservation. New and changed water <br />rights should come with requirements that build <br />in conservation. <br /> <br />. The system should give diverters incentives to con- <br />serve, as in Oregon, where irrigators are allowed to <br />keep, use or sell 75% of the water they save through <br />conservation so long as they return 25% to the stream, <br /> <br />. Several states, including South Dakota, Oregon and <br />Utah, consider environmental and fisheries effects, <br />water quality, and/or impacts to critical species before <br />approving new or changed water rights. <br /> <br /> <br />Conej OS <br /> <br />Even small local groups can make a big <br />difference for degraded rivers. The Conejos <br />River in southern Colorado suffers from low <br />winter streamflows below Platoro Reservoir, <br />which provides irrigation water to the San Luis <br />Valley. The Conejos Water Conservancy District <br />regulates streamflows out of the reservoir, but <br />the releases fall well below the minimum flow <br />targets recommended by state biologists. While <br />recommended flows were 30-40 as, the actual <br />releases required from Platoro are only 7 as in <br />winter and 25 as in summer months. These low <br />flows leave little of the deeper pool habitat that <br />larger, adult trout need to surviv~ and thrive. <br />A Division of Wildlife (DOW) memo states,"The <br />management implications of a 5 or 7 as winter <br />flow bypass are that adult trout will not survive <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. Rather than continue to allow limitless additional <br />new water rights in over-appropriated watersheds, <br />Colorado should consider closing some riv~rs to <br />increased diversions, as Montana and Washington <br />have done, respectively, on the Blackfoot and <br />Yakima rivers, <br /> <br />. Currently, water users risk abandonment of their <br />rights if they choose not to divert water but rather to <br />leave it in the stream for aesthetic or environmental <br />benefit. Colorado could empower private parties to <br />protect the flows in oW" rivers and streams by allowing <br />private parties to convert existing water rights for <br />the purpose of leaving water in those streams, as is <br />allowed in California. Alaska, Arizona, and Nevada <br />all have laws that allow private parties to. obtain <br />instream flow water rights. <br />. In Montana, although private individuals cannot own <br />instream water rights, they can lease water now being <br />diverted and put that water to use instream for up to <br />30 years. <br /> <br /> <br />in the river immediately below the dam on a <br />year-round basis." A later study by the DOW <br />confirmed that only 6% of the trout in this reach <br />are adults two years of age or more, illustrating <br />that the adult survival rate is low. <br /> <br />The San Luis Valley Chapter ofTrout <br />Unlimited has worked to make the best of <br />this situation through habitat improvements to <br />create deeper holding waters for trout during <br />low flow conditions. The Chapter has completed <br />stream improvements on two miles of stream <br />below Platoro. Their improvements have given <br />adult trout a better chance in the Conejos-and <br />could provide even more benefit if additional <br />water could be purchased to enhance <br />winter flows. ' <br /> <br />.. <br />